Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Tie Utility
Tie utility represents a reconcepualization of the tie measure and provides a multidimensional taxonomy of social network ties. Conceptual dimensions include socioemotional closeness, information potential, and accessibility. Social network analysis defines an edge between two nodes (actors) as a social tie. Research into quantifying the value of a tie has taken different approaches, with the most common measurement being the strength (or weakness) of a tie. The strong tie–weak tie dichotomy can be conceptually ambiguous, as its use in the literature does not represent polar sides of a continuum but rather two different theoretical areas that operate independently, with strength representing socioemotional support and weakness representing access to resources. A large number of measurements have been employed in a myriad of contexts, yet the science of networks lacks clear conceptualization of ties that allows for consistent definition of the measure. This conceptual gap has led researchers to operationalize the tie measure in a contextually specific manner, often unique to their particular research design. Tie utility presents a conceptual taxonomy for the clarification of the tie measure.
The Value and Strength of Ties
There are many important works that examine the value of ties. Mark Granovetter studied how weak ties can provide different advantages to actors in a network. His seminal research suggested that weak ties are more likely to serve as bridges between different network clusters. These ties give individuals access to networks with which they are not usually affiliated and offer information and resources they could not obtain from their strong ties. Taking a different approach, David Krackhardt addressed the influence and power of strong ties. Findings showed that strong ties based on trust and affection can help reduce resistance to change and provide comfort in uncertain situations, and indicated that those members who had strong ties were more likely to offer emotional support and trust each others' opinions.
Contrasting views relating to the strength of ties can often come from different indicators. Although researchers make valid claims regarding strong and weak ties, they often use different methods to measure tie strength. That is, the conceptualizations of weak and strong ties are often not the same across different bodies of research. Many studies make strong arguments concerning the effects of strong and weak ties, with respect to each author's definition, but they are often based on different predetermined indicators. There is an abundance of research that studies and applies the strength of ties, but few that directly address concerns regarding tie strength indicators or how they are interconnected with each other and are often vague in exactly what measurement was being used or how it was obtained. Those studies that are specific to a particular component are not always compatible with the different social aspects in a tie and are difficult to generalize outside the study.
Altering tie strength indicators will result in different values, and several indicators can give misleading information, depending on the study. For example, frequency of contact will overvalue neighbors and coworkers and undervalue close family members who live far away. Similarly, duration of relationship can overvalue extended family members. These flaws can affect how research concerning tie strength is conducted.
...
- History of Social Networking
- American Revolutionary War
- Ancient China
- Ancient Egypt
- Ancient Greece
- Ancient India
- Ancient Rome
- Civil War, U.S.
- Colonial America
- Earliest Civilizations
- History of Social Networks 1865–1899
- History of Social Networks 1900–1929
- History of Social Networks 1930–1940
- History of Social Networks 1941–1945
- History of Social Networks 1946–1959
- History of Social Networks 1960–1975
- History of Social Networks 1976–1999
- History of Social Networks 2000–Present
- Industrial Revolution
- Internet History and Networks
- Middle Ages
- Native Americans
- Renaissance
- World-Systems Networks
- Local U.S. Social Networks by State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia (State)
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Privacy and Rights in Social Networks
- Social Network Analysis and Issues
- Affiliation Networks
- Agent-Based Models
- Bipartite networks
- Blockmodeling
- Cohesion Networks
- Complexity
- Cooperation/Coordination
- Dating
- Egocentric Networks
- Embeddedness
- Exchange Networks
- Exponential Randon Graph Models (ERGM/p*)
- Graph Theory
- Homophily
- Longitudinal Networks
- Multiplexed Networks
- Network Analysis Software
- Network Evolution
- Network Indicators
- Network Simulations
- Network Theory
- Network Visualization
- Paths/Walks/Cycles
- Pornography Networks
- Power Law Networks
- Preferential Attachment
- Prominence
- Proximity/Space
- Q-Analysis
- Random Graph Models
- Reciprocity
- Self-Organizing Networks
- Semantic Networks
- Small World
- Social Capital
- Social Influence
- Social Support
- Stalking
- Structural Equivalence
- Structural Holes
- Structural Theory
- Tie Length
- Tie Strength
- Tie Utility
- Tipping Point
- Triads
- Trust and Networks
- Two-Mode Networks
- Word Networks
- Social Networking around the World
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Central African Republic
- Chad, Republic of
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Eritrea
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- Finland
- France
- Georgia (Country)
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kurdistan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Laos
- Latvia
- Libya
- Lithuania
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Mali
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Korea
- Norway
- Pakistan
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Somalia
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Syria
- Tajikistan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Togo
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
- Social Networking Communities
- Adults-Only Communities
- Artists Communities
- Blogs and Networks
- Books Communities
- Classmates
- College Students Communities
- CouchSurfing
- Deviant Communities
- Elitist Communities
- Games Communities
- Investing Communities
- Local Political Activism Communities
- Mothers Communities
- Movie and TV Series Communities
- Music Communities
- MySpace
- Newsgroups
- People with Disabilities Communities
- Religious Communities
- Scientific Communities
- Teen Communities
- Wikipedia
- Yahoo!
- YouTube and Video Exchange
- Social Networking Organizations
- AARP (American Association of Retired Persons)
- Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
- Charity Organizations
- Conservative Organizations
- Government Networks
- Greenpeace
- International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
- Liberal Organizations
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs)
- Unions
- United Nations
- United Service Organizations (USO)
- Social Science of Networking
- Alumni Networks
- Anthropological Networks
- Bibliometrics/Citation Networks
- Cancer Networks
- Children's Networks
- Cognitive Networks
- Communication Networks
- Conspiracy Theory and Gossip Networks
- Corporate Networking
- Diet Networks
- Diffusion/Contagion Networks
- Economic Networks
- Educational Networks
- Employment Networks
- Entrepreneurial Networks
- Environmental Activism
- Ethnicity and Networks
- Fan Networks
- Fraternities
- Game Theory and Networks
- Gangs
- Gender and Networks
- Health Networks
- Hobby Networks
- Human Rights Networks
- Infectious Disease Networks
- Innovation Networks
- Interdepartmental Networks
- International Networks
- Interorganizational/Interlocks
- Kinship Networks
- Knowledge Networks
- Leadership Networks
- Letter-Writing
- Military Networks
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Network Psychology
- Network Visualization
- Organizational Networks
- Policy Networks
- Religious Communities
- Scholar Networks
- Senior Networks
- Small Group Networks
- Sororities
- Sports Networks
- Telecommunication Networks
- Twelve-Step Programs
- Urban Networks
- War and Networks
- Women's Networks
- Technology and Social Networking
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches