Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In social network analysis, social units (individuals, groups, and so forth) are often referred to as nodes. The relationships among the social units are commonly referred to as ties. One of the fundamental concepts in social networks analysis is the notion of tie strength. The theoretical relevance of tie strength was highlighted in one of the most cited articles in sociology, “The Strength of Weak Ties” (1973) by Mark Granovetter. Tie strength is thought to be theoretically important in a number of different contexts. However, defining what is meant by tie strength is somewhat more elusive than it would appear at first glance. According to Granovetter, the strength of an interpersonal tie is a combination of the amount of time, emotional intensity, intimacy, and reciprocal services that characterize the tie. This entry begins by reviewing the key aspects of Granovetter's strength of weak ties argument, including the issue of operationalizing tie strength as well as the issue of tie strength in interorganizational relations. The concept has been applied to several substantive problems, including collective action and social movements, getting a job, social support, social cohesion, and the small-world problem.

The Strength of Weak Ties

Granovetter discusses a number of different aspects of tie strength and its implications, situating part of his analysis in the context of getting a job by posing the question: what type of tie should be more important for helping one get a job? He argues that the “common sense” response to this question is that those with whom one has strong ties (such as close friends and family members) will be more helpful in job searches because they are more motivated to help. There are theoretical reasons, however, to expect that weak ties (such as ties to acquaintances) will be more important, and he provides empirical support for this by presenting findings from a study of white-collar job changers.

According to Granovetter, weak ties and strong ties are distinct in a couple of important ways. First of all, people tend to have many more weak ties than strong ties. For example, individuals tend to have hundreds or thousands of ties to acquaintances. By contrast, people tend to have a relatively small number of strong ties, such as close friends and family members—typically half a dozen to a dozen. Second, there tends to be structural “inbreeding” with strong ties; that is, the people to whom one is strongly tied also tend to be tied to one another. One's friends tend to know one another, and one's family members tend to know one another. Weak ties are much less likely be inbred or to know one another. Thus, weak ties tend to stretch farther in terms of social distance.

The consequence of the differing properties of weak ties versus strong ties is that weak ties are much more likely to be sources of novel information, whereas information in one's strong-tie sector tends to be redundant; because one's friends tend to be interconnected, they also tend to possess the same information. Hence, to the extent that receiving novel information about the existence of a job is important in the job search process, in some situations, weak ties may be more useful for helping someone get a job.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading