Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Structural Holes
A structural hole in a social network exists between two of a focal actor's contacts if they are nonredundant. Contacts are redundant due either to cohesion, where they have a direct connection to one another, or through structural equivalence, where they have no direct connection but are indirectly connected to the same other actors. Actors who are able to bridge structural holes are also known as brokers or liaisons.
The theory of structural holes assumes that being a liaison is beneficial to the focal actor. When contacts are neither directly nor indirectly connected to one another, then it follows that the structural hole between them has two features: (1) the two contacts provide access to structurally separate pools of information, and (2) the focal actor serves as the unique broker between the contacts, rendering him tertius gaudens (the third who benefits). That is, a structural hole confers a liaison with greater ability to broker indirect connections between other contacts and control the flow of information between them. By providing information and brokerage benefits, structural holes constitute a form of social capital.
The ability to broker indirect connections between other contacts and control the flow of information is a form of social capital.

Research on structural holes has provided empirical support for such structural advantages. Structural advantages in this work are typically measured using the constraint measure, which mathematically captures the degree of redundancy in the ego-network of an actor. Employees and managers with less constraint in their personal networks show better performance evaluations, faster promotions, higher compensation, and better ideas. Organizations in positions of brokerage are perceived as more influential and tend to have higher profit margins. Structural holes have also been found to be associated with more success in organized crime, and the phenomenon has also been identified in early Renaissance politics; for example, politically powerful Medici occupied a central position in the 15th-century network of elite Italian families.
Relationship to other Social Network Concepts
The concept of structural holes is related to other concepts in social network analysis in important ways. Connections to nonredundant contacts tend to be weak ties, as close friends and family members often have many social relationships in common. Weak ties have been found to be associated with greater access to fresh information, in concordance with the information access argument in the theory of structural holes.
The betweenness measure in a network refers to the degree to which an actor lies on shortest paths between pairs of other actors, termed geodesics. Bridging a structural hole generally increases the betweenness centrality for an actor because the shortest path length between pairs of unconnected actors will tend to flow through structural holes.
While structural holes are one form of social capital, closure is another. Networks with high closure have disproportional numbers of closed triads, where A, B, and C are all connected to one another. By definition, actors in these networks must have many redundant contacts. The theoretical argument goes that closure provides direct access to high-quality information, which deteriorates as it moves from one person to another. Closure also facilitates trust by enabling sanctioning. After A abuses B's trust, B can tell C. This would jeopardize the opportunity for A to obtain C's trust. With the threat of sanctioning in place, A will be more inclined to honor B's trust, and anticipating this, B will be more likely to place trust in A.
...
- History of Social Networking
- American Revolutionary War
- Ancient China
- Ancient Egypt
- Ancient Greece
- Ancient India
- Ancient Rome
- Civil War, U.S.
- Colonial America
- Earliest Civilizations
- History of Social Networks 1865–1899
- History of Social Networks 1900–1929
- History of Social Networks 1930–1940
- History of Social Networks 1941–1945
- History of Social Networks 1946–1959
- History of Social Networks 1960–1975
- History of Social Networks 1976–1999
- History of Social Networks 2000–Present
- Industrial Revolution
- Internet History and Networks
- Middle Ages
- Native Americans
- Renaissance
- World-Systems Networks
- Local U.S. Social Networks by State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia (State)
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Privacy and Rights in Social Networks
- Social Network Analysis and Issues
- Affiliation Networks
- Agent-Based Models
- Bipartite networks
- Blockmodeling
- Cohesion Networks
- Complexity
- Cooperation/Coordination
- Dating
- Egocentric Networks
- Embeddedness
- Exchange Networks
- Exponential Randon Graph Models (ERGM/p*)
- Graph Theory
- Homophily
- Longitudinal Networks
- Multiplexed Networks
- Network Analysis Software
- Network Evolution
- Network Indicators
- Network Simulations
- Network Theory
- Network Visualization
- Paths/Walks/Cycles
- Pornography Networks
- Power Law Networks
- Preferential Attachment
- Prominence
- Proximity/Space
- Q-Analysis
- Random Graph Models
- Reciprocity
- Self-Organizing Networks
- Semantic Networks
- Small World
- Social Capital
- Social Influence
- Social Support
- Stalking
- Structural Equivalence
- Structural Holes
- Structural Theory
- Tie Length
- Tie Strength
- Tie Utility
- Tipping Point
- Triads
- Trust and Networks
- Two-Mode Networks
- Word Networks
- Social Networking around the World
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Central African Republic
- Chad, Republic of
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Eritrea
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- Finland
- France
- Georgia (Country)
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kurdistan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Laos
- Latvia
- Libya
- Lithuania
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Mali
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Korea
- Norway
- Pakistan
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Somalia
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Syria
- Tajikistan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Togo
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
- Social Networking Communities
- Adults-Only Communities
- Artists Communities
- Blogs and Networks
- Books Communities
- Classmates
- College Students Communities
- CouchSurfing
- Deviant Communities
- Elitist Communities
- Games Communities
- Investing Communities
- Local Political Activism Communities
- Mothers Communities
- Movie and TV Series Communities
- Music Communities
- MySpace
- Newsgroups
- People with Disabilities Communities
- Religious Communities
- Scientific Communities
- Teen Communities
- Wikipedia
- Yahoo!
- YouTube and Video Exchange
- Social Networking Organizations
- AARP (American Association of Retired Persons)
- Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
- Charity Organizations
- Conservative Organizations
- Government Networks
- Greenpeace
- International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
- Liberal Organizations
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs)
- Unions
- United Nations
- United Service Organizations (USO)
- Social Science of Networking
- Alumni Networks
- Anthropological Networks
- Bibliometrics/Citation Networks
- Cancer Networks
- Children's Networks
- Cognitive Networks
- Communication Networks
- Conspiracy Theory and Gossip Networks
- Corporate Networking
- Diet Networks
- Diffusion/Contagion Networks
- Economic Networks
- Educational Networks
- Employment Networks
- Entrepreneurial Networks
- Environmental Activism
- Ethnicity and Networks
- Fan Networks
- Fraternities
- Game Theory and Networks
- Gangs
- Gender and Networks
- Health Networks
- Hobby Networks
- Human Rights Networks
- Infectious Disease Networks
- Innovation Networks
- Interdepartmental Networks
- International Networks
- Interorganizational/Interlocks
- Kinship Networks
- Knowledge Networks
- Leadership Networks
- Letter-Writing
- Military Networks
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Network Psychology
- Network Visualization
- Organizational Networks
- Policy Networks
- Religious Communities
- Scholar Networks
- Senior Networks
- Small Group Networks
- Sororities
- Sports Networks
- Telecommunication Networks
- Twelve-Step Programs
- Urban Networks
- War and Networks
- Women's Networks
- Technology and Social Networking
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches