Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

People with Disabilities Communities

There has been considerable debate surrounding the appropriate terminology to be used in reference to those with physical conditions that limit their activities. While the term handicapped has been largely abandoned, some are comfortable with the term disabled, while others prefer the term differently abled. In an effort to be sensitive to this debate and the issues reflected in terminology choice, this discussion will use the term disabled, given its more common use in network literature.

Disability serves as a measure of a person's diminished capacity or inability to perform basic self-care tasks that are usually required for independent living. More people now live with disabilities of some kind, a direct result of improved medical care, longer life spans, and rising survival rates from birth defects, life-threatening and chronic diseases, injuries from war, and accidents. Disability is often associated with and complicated by low income levels and increased age, factors characterized by minimal social networks. Thus, relational connections for disabled persons are extremely important, as they provide necessary sources of care and support.

Networks of Trust and Reciprocity

Relational connections enable persons of all ability levels to give what they have to offer in an effort to enhance the social life of the collective. These altruistic actions are accompanied by an understood element of reciprocity, which further supports the social good while fulfilling individuals' needs on an ongoing basis. The positive, long-term effects of having individual needs met through relational connections are evident in the establishment of social trust, strengthened relationships of mutual dependency, and creation of social capital. Networks of social connection provide individuals with avenues for helping others and channels for seeking help when needed. For disabled individuals, these networks are primary sources of care, friendship, and support.

Income and disability tend to be correlated, as those with disabilities are often at the lower end of socioeconomic markers. Education and income are also related to social networks. For example, people with higher education and higher income tend to have larger networks. These same characteristics are correlated with the proportion of nonfamily members in the network.

U.S. Navy Master-at-Arms 3rd Class Nathan DeWalt competes in the Warrior Games on May 12, 2010, in Colorado Springs. Since being paralyzed in a stateside accident, he networks with other injured veterans to raise funds for the Wounded Warriors program.

Disability is also often correlated with age, referred to as functional decline. As adults mature in the aging process, disability can manifest. Declines in the networks of older adults has been described mainly in terms of different life events such as widowhood, the death of network links, decline in resources, and geodemographic or migration patterns. The advantages of social networks in relation to disabilities in older adults are well documented.

Literature suggests that social networks may have strong positive effects for people with disabilities. The buffering effects of social networks may be quite powerful for elderly people and those of low socioeconomic status who have impaired physical functioning and who need to cope with the physical, psychological, and financial consequences of their limitations. In addition, social networks are associated with health outcomes such as a lower risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, cancer mortality, and functional decline.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading