Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Kinship networks are defined broadly as extended family, including biological relationships, genealogy, marriage, and other self-ascribed associations, beyond the family nucleus of parents and dependent children. Kinship is not conceptualized as a fixed meaning of natural or genealogical relationship but as a socially and culturally constructed and maintained network of individuals in constant flux. The boundaries between kinship, community, and friendship networks are increasingly blurred, thus biology, sexuality, and descendancy are no longer the sole defining factors to understand kinship.

Historically, marriage and kinship was one of the most significant factors organizing and structuring people's economic, political, and social life. Regardless of its exact social function, marriage was not for the sole benefit of the husband and wife; in particular, the needs of women and children were often secondary considerations. Rather, marriage and the consequently emerging kinship ties and networks helped to raise capital, maintain privilege and family lines across generations, organize the division of labor, create political alliances, and define parent-children authority relationships.

Structural analysis of kinship networks maps the relation between individuals and examines social ties and the frequency of contacts, directness of interaction, network density, household composition, and generational exchanges, among other variables. Functional analysis of kinship networks focuses on the construction and maintenance of social ties; questions of reciprocity; and the kind and amount of support given and received by members of the network, including instrumental (carework, household help, and financial and material assistance) and expressive (socioemotional and psychological) support. Kinship networks as social support systems could help reduce stress, ease crises in child care, mitigate the isolation of women in nuclear families, and create a cushion from poverty. On the negative side, some research found that participation in kinship networks increased stress and hindered economic mobility for individuals of lower socioeconomic status.

Anthropology of Kinship Networks

Early anthropological work on kinship, pioneered by Lewis Henry Morgan, was based on the distinction between descriptive and classificatory kinship systems. Descriptive kinship systems assert clear labels for various kin members, derived from their relative genealogical, affinal, or fictive distance. Classificatory kinship systems use abstract rules to define kinship relationships, often disregarding genealogical relations. The seven systems of kinship based on relation-defining distinctions were Crow, Dravidian, Eskimo, Hawaiian, Iroquois, Omaha, and Sudanese.

Anthropologists attempted to find the universals about human kinship (often concentrating on the role of the family nucleus) by looking at behavioral and psychological similarities of different cultures. On the other hand, studying non-European cultures, Claude Levi-Strauss argued that not descent, but marriage and the subsequent family alliance define the interdependence of kinship. He classified structures of kinships based on marriage rules: elementary structures specified whom a woman must marry, while complex structures specified whom a person must not marry.

British social anthropologists (most notably Alfred Radcliffe-Brown and Bronislaw Malinowski) and the Manchester School of Anthropology (for instance, Max Gluckman and J. Clyde Mitchell) attempted to understand kinship as a culturally constructed local network of interdependence, rather than universally applicable systems. Their work shies away from cross-cultural generalization and focuses on how individuals participate and navigate change and tension in kinship situations, although their use of network was a metaphor rather than an organizing social principle. While British social anthropology is often critiqued for its overdeterministic functionalism, in particular treating kinship as equilibrium in a changing culture, their scholarship opened up the intellectual space for a more flexible approach to understand kinship.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading