Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Human Rights Networks
Human rights social networking is as old as human society. Examples of advocacy to advance human rights are historic and include the French and American Revolutions; the Underground Railroad; and civil, women's, and gay rights movements, among many others. Political parties, community organizations, and social and religious groups have all advocated their respective causes. Prior to the age of modern technology, methods included word of mouth, public speaking, protest activities, and printed materials.
The concept of human rights is founded in an understanding of the inherent value of each individual and is embedded in the social matrix of modern societies. While many believe the term human rights was defined following the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi war criminals (1945–46), which resulted in the formation of the United Nations and the Declaration of Human Rights, the underlying principles are much older. Civil interaction, meaning to advocate and create change to benefit one's self and the circumstances of others, has its roots in earliest recorded times. The successes of human beings striving to create a world of change even in the face of dominating, suppressive, and repressive ruling bodies, dictators, and monarchies have been documented throughout history. Many nongovernmental, grassroots organizations work to create social change and force governmental social networks to enact laws to protect individual rights. An understanding of human rights in the context of social networks begins with a historical overview of human rights, a focus on the importance of social networking, an exploration of events and issues defining and ensuring human rights, and the role of modern technology in expanding human rights networks.
Historical Definitions
One of the earliest documented human rights records is the ancient Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (approximately 1790 B.C.E.). The code, engraved on a large stone intended for public viewing, enunciated 282 laws, in very simple language, organized around themes (slavery, theft, judges, commerce, inheritance). While it did not specify the rights of individuals, it defined punishments for infringement. The code also identified aspects of the familial social network, defining the rights and responsibilities of parents, children, husbands, and wives.
The ancient Greeks are often credited with the development of the concept of natural rights. They believed all human behavior is governed by basic innate laws, or laws of nature. Many natural-law theorists believe all humans are essentially reasonable, and their motives are driven by a sense of self-preservation. The 17th-century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes viewed natural law as how a rational human being, seeking to survive and prosper, would behave. He viewed people as acting from self-interest and government as necessary to ensure that self-interest did not supersede the rights or safety of others. Thus arose the concept of the social contract through which individuals gained civil rights by subjecting oneself to civil authority or governance. John Locke, a scholar, medical researcher, physician, and revolutionary philosopher of the 17th and 18th centuries, believed a legitimate government is instituted by the explicit consent of the governed. The purpose of law is not to abolish or restrain but to preserve and enlarge freedom. He expanded the concept of natural law by affirming that people were born with three rights: the right to life, property, and liberty or freedom. Thus, a social network of individuals agrees to be governed and shares expectations of the rights to be equally enjoyed.
...
- History of Social Networking
- American Revolutionary War
- Ancient China
- Ancient Egypt
- Ancient Greece
- Ancient India
- Ancient Rome
- Civil War, U.S.
- Colonial America
- Earliest Civilizations
- History of Social Networks 1865–1899
- History of Social Networks 1900–1929
- History of Social Networks 1930–1940
- History of Social Networks 1941–1945
- History of Social Networks 1946–1959
- History of Social Networks 1960–1975
- History of Social Networks 1976–1999
- History of Social Networks 2000–Present
- Industrial Revolution
- Internet History and Networks
- Middle Ages
- Native Americans
- Renaissance
- World-Systems Networks
- Local U.S. Social Networks by State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia (State)
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Privacy and Rights in Social Networks
- Social Network Analysis and Issues
- Affiliation Networks
- Agent-Based Models
- Bipartite networks
- Blockmodeling
- Cohesion Networks
- Complexity
- Cooperation/Coordination
- Dating
- Egocentric Networks
- Embeddedness
- Exchange Networks
- Exponential Randon Graph Models (ERGM/p*)
- Graph Theory
- Homophily
- Longitudinal Networks
- Multiplexed Networks
- Network Analysis Software
- Network Evolution
- Network Indicators
- Network Simulations
- Network Theory
- Network Visualization
- Paths/Walks/Cycles
- Pornography Networks
- Power Law Networks
- Preferential Attachment
- Prominence
- Proximity/Space
- Q-Analysis
- Random Graph Models
- Reciprocity
- Self-Organizing Networks
- Semantic Networks
- Small World
- Social Capital
- Social Influence
- Social Support
- Stalking
- Structural Equivalence
- Structural Holes
- Structural Theory
- Tie Length
- Tie Strength
- Tie Utility
- Tipping Point
- Triads
- Trust and Networks
- Two-Mode Networks
- Word Networks
- Social Networking around the World
- Afghanistan
- Algeria
- Angola
- Argentina
- Armenia
- Australia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Benin
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Cambodia
- Cameroon
- Canada
- Central African Republic
- Chad, Republic of
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cuba
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Eritrea
- Estonia
- Ethiopia
- Finland
- France
- Georgia (Country)
- Germany
- Ghana
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Guinea
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kurdistan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Laos
- Latvia
- Libya
- Lithuania
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Mali
- Mexico
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigeria
- North Korea
- Norway
- Pakistan
- Papua New Guinea
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
- Senegal
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
- Singapore
- Slovakia
- Somalia
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Syria
- Tajikistan
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Togo
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Vietnam
- Yemen
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
- Social Networking Communities
- Adults-Only Communities
- Artists Communities
- Blogs and Networks
- Books Communities
- Classmates
- College Students Communities
- CouchSurfing
- Deviant Communities
- Elitist Communities
- Games Communities
- Investing Communities
- Local Political Activism Communities
- Mothers Communities
- Movie and TV Series Communities
- Music Communities
- MySpace
- Newsgroups
- People with Disabilities Communities
- Religious Communities
- Scientific Communities
- Teen Communities
- Wikipedia
- Yahoo!
- YouTube and Video Exchange
- Social Networking Organizations
- AARP (American Association of Retired Persons)
- Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
- Charity Organizations
- Conservative Organizations
- Government Networks
- Greenpeace
- International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
- Liberal Organizations
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs)
- Unions
- United Nations
- United Service Organizations (USO)
- Social Science of Networking
- Alumni Networks
- Anthropological Networks
- Bibliometrics/Citation Networks
- Cancer Networks
- Children's Networks
- Cognitive Networks
- Communication Networks
- Conspiracy Theory and Gossip Networks
- Corporate Networking
- Diet Networks
- Diffusion/Contagion Networks
- Economic Networks
- Educational Networks
- Employment Networks
- Entrepreneurial Networks
- Environmental Activism
- Ethnicity and Networks
- Fan Networks
- Fraternities
- Game Theory and Networks
- Gangs
- Gender and Networks
- Health Networks
- Hobby Networks
- Human Rights Networks
- Infectious Disease Networks
- Innovation Networks
- Interdepartmental Networks
- International Networks
- Interorganizational/Interlocks
- Kinship Networks
- Knowledge Networks
- Leadership Networks
- Letter-Writing
- Military Networks
- Neighborhood Organizations
- Network Psychology
- Network Visualization
- Organizational Networks
- Policy Networks
- Religious Communities
- Scholar Networks
- Senior Networks
- Small Group Networks
- Sororities
- Sports Networks
- Telecommunication Networks
- Twelve-Step Programs
- Urban Networks
- War and Networks
- Women's Networks
- Technology and Social Networking
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches