Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Human rights social networking is as old as human society. Examples of advocacy to advance human rights are historic and include the French and American Revolutions; the Underground Railroad; and civil, women's, and gay rights movements, among many others. Political parties, community organizations, and social and religious groups have all advocated their respective causes. Prior to the age of modern technology, methods included word of mouth, public speaking, protest activities, and printed materials.

The concept of human rights is founded in an understanding of the inherent value of each individual and is embedded in the social matrix of modern societies. While many believe the term human rights was defined following the Nuremberg Trials of Nazi war criminals (1945–46), which resulted in the formation of the United Nations and the Declaration of Human Rights, the underlying principles are much older. Civil interaction, meaning to advocate and create change to benefit one's self and the circumstances of others, has its roots in earliest recorded times. The successes of human beings striving to create a world of change even in the face of dominating, suppressive, and repressive ruling bodies, dictators, and monarchies have been documented throughout history. Many nongovernmental, grassroots organizations work to create social change and force governmental social networks to enact laws to protect individual rights. An understanding of human rights in the context of social networks begins with a historical overview of human rights, a focus on the importance of social networking, an exploration of events and issues defining and ensuring human rights, and the role of modern technology in expanding human rights networks.

Historical Definitions

One of the earliest documented human rights records is the ancient Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (approximately 1790 B.C.E.). The code, engraved on a large stone intended for public viewing, enunciated 282 laws, in very simple language, organized around themes (slavery, theft, judges, commerce, inheritance). While it did not specify the rights of individuals, it defined punishments for infringement. The code also identified aspects of the familial social network, defining the rights and responsibilities of parents, children, husbands, and wives.

The ancient Greeks are often credited with the development of the concept of natural rights. They believed all human behavior is governed by basic innate laws, or laws of nature. Many natural-law theorists believe all humans are essentially reasonable, and their motives are driven by a sense of self-preservation. The 17th-century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes viewed natural law as how a rational human being, seeking to survive and prosper, would behave. He viewed people as acting from self-interest and government as necessary to ensure that self-interest did not supersede the rights or safety of others. Thus arose the concept of the social contract through which individuals gained civil rights by subjecting oneself to civil authority or governance. John Locke, a scholar, medical researcher, physician, and revolutionary philosopher of the 17th and 18th centuries, believed a legitimate government is instituted by the explicit consent of the governed. The purpose of law is not to abolish or restrain but to preserve and enlarge freedom. He expanded the concept of natural law by affirming that people were born with three rights: the right to life, property, and liberty or freedom. Thus, a social network of individuals agrees to be governed and shares expectations of the rights to be equally enjoyed.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading