Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Trust is a key element in the initiation of cooperation and the formation of attitudes, and it therefore plays an important role in the acceptance of new technologies. Most people cannot evaluate the benefits and risks associated with technological developments because they lack the basic knowledge required for such evaluations. As a result, they have to rely on the assessments of experts. In controversial fields like gene technology or nanotechnology, there are experts with conflicting views. By definition, laypeople are largely unable to evaluate the technical arguments voiced by these experts. Laypeople must rely instead on cues like trust in selecting which experts to believe. As suggested by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, trust is a method for reducing the complexity that confronts us in a modern society characterized by highly developed division of labor. Instead of becoming technically learned in various fields, we take the risk of trusting experts and accepting their assessments. Trust is most important in situations that are distinguished by a high level of uncertainty and/or a high degree of personal moral importance.

Trust has been examined in various social science fields, such as psychology, mass communication, marketing, and risk management. This research shows the importance of trust for attitude formation and cooperation. Cooperation has been measured in a variety of ways—as willingness to buy a product or willingness to accept a hazard-management policy, for example. Attitude is also a rather broad concept. Initially, attitude was defined as an overall evaluation of an entity, ranging from negative to positive. For entities people are not familiar with, trust may have a strong impact on attitude formation. This condition applies to many controversial emerging technologies.

Various Forms of Trust

There is no consensus among researchers how to define trust. In empirical studies, various scales haven been used to measure trust. This is one reason why the sizes of correlations between trust and cooperation or attitudes vary considerably across studies. It is important, therefore, to distinguish different forms of trust.

The concept of general trust, or generalized interpersonal trust, was introduced by psychologist Julian Rotter. General trust was first developed as a personality variable, and it measures nonspecific trust in most people or strangers. People high in general trust are willing to cooperate with people with whom they had no prior interactions. Results of experimental studies suggest that participants with high general trust are more likely to cooperate with anonymous people than participants with low general trust. Civic engagement and general trust seem to be correlated, and general trust has been viewed as a form of social capital. General trust items are included in such large-scale surveys as the General Social Survey and the World Values Survey.

Another type of trust, mainly examined in the domain of social psychology, is interpersonal trust. This form of trust involves some degree of interaction among people. Trust between spouses or trust between coworkers can be viewed as interpersonal trust. This type of trust is restricted to personal relationships, and it is therefore not as relevant for mass communication studies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading