Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

No concept associated with environmental protection has enjoyed more widespread public legitimacy than sustainability, something scientists and social activists alike have long advocated in an attempt to encourage careful use of resources. The premises for sustainability are that care for the environment is essential to social and economic development; that natural resources are the base of industry, including agriculture; and that only by sustaining that base can humanity sustain development. It is a systemic concept for suggesting how society might enable all beings to meet their needs and express themselves while preserving diversity, both within the human species and beyond it. The idea of sustainability is likely to remain prominent in public discourse surrounding the interaction of environment and economic development.

The concept is complicated by its intrinsic combination of systemic science and normative values. During the last decade of the 20th century, this concept gained substantial traction within both the public and private sectors. With the publication of Our Common Future by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, the idea was imported into the popular lexicon via the term sustainable development (SD). An explosion in publications utilizing the term soon followed. It became a centerpiece for global development policy following the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and continued in that role during the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Develop ment in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Although the current notion of sustainability is only a few decades old, the overall concept has been applied at one time or another throughout human history. Research on tribal cultures indicates a widespread human capacity to determine, and live safely within, limits of sustainability characteristic of the ecosystems that they occupy. Hunter-gatherer cultures are a case in point, with controls on population levels and a nomadic lifestyle that enables rejuvenation of resources when groups move to the next hunting ground. Yet human societies appear to have drawn on that capacity only rarely. Although the need to achieve sustainability in the use of land and biotic resources has been referred to in writings dating back at least to ancient Greece, human civilizations appear to have been plagued by environmental collapse.

Eliminating the Human Versus Nature Dichotomy

Unlike other 20th- and 21st-century attempts at environmental conservation or preservation that have contributed to a perceived dichotomy between humans and nature, sustainability offers an attempt to appeal to both biocentric and anthropocentric values of the environment. A bio-centric perspective reflects an egalitarian view of nature and promotes the normative ideal that, because all forms of life are equally valuable, all are equally deserving of care and protection. An anthropocentric perspective magnifies the importance of humans and promotes the normative ideal that, because humans are at the center of the cosmos, human dominance over nature is both natural and desirable.

Though these two value systems are often at odds with one another, sustainability is a banner under which they can jointly explore ethical questions about natural and ecological integrity. Biocentric language can specify duties to preserve nature, but presents little guidance for interacting with environments in which the technologies of civilization have largely displaced the natural order. Anthropocentric language can specify duties to conserve resources for future use, but fails to build any concept of ecosystem integrity into that obligation. Sustainability, on the other hand, offers a conceptualization of ecological integrity that includes humanity. Rather than attempting to displace anthropocentric perspectives with biocentric perspectives (or vice versa), it suggests integrating human concerns into our thinking about the larger biosphere. The term sustainable development, for example, uses a biocentric presumption of deep interconnectedness between all forms of life to support the anthropocentric argument that the well-being of future generations of humans depends on the conservation of natural resources.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading