Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

To a greater or lesser extent, scientists and science-performing institutions are in the business of communicating about their research. Peer-to-peer communication characterizes most “scientific” communication, and much of that is moderated through academic journals, professional conferences, and in technical seminars and symposia—many researchers resist or feel uncomfortable engaging in “public” communication about their work. But societal and political pressures are placing increasing pressure on scientists and research institutions not only to communicate to the public about the research they perform, but also to make sure that public communication has the desired impact of broadening public support for the scientific enterprise more broadly. In other words, the purpose is not just to communicate, but to communicate strategically.

For the most part, this entry discusses strategic communications within a research-performing or research-funding organization, such as a university, corporation, or government agency. Within the past few decades, most of these organizations have hired science writers or other science communicators to do the job of communicating with the nonscientific public about the organization, its mission, and its research. However, most science communicators are empowered to make only tactical, day-to-day decisions—whether to write a news release or shoot b-roll, which news stories to feature in the organization's magazine, whether to put stories on the Web, in print, or both. Very few of these science communicators are empowered to make strategic decisions about the kinds of science communication the organization does, the role of science communicators in the organization, the relationship of the organization to its audiences or publics, or the commitment of organizational resources toward communication. Strategic communication about science and technology starts with having the science communicators at the organization's decision-making table, where they must be able to help set organizational policy and priorities, as well as implement them.

A strategic approach to communication implies mindfulness of the news or information environment in which the organization finds itself, the key messages the institution wishes to convey, the audiences to whom the messages should be targeted and how they acquire and use information, the expected outcomes of the message (awareness, understanding, behavior), the success of the messages in eliciting those outcomes, and how the communication function of the organization is integrated into organizational politics and culture.

Who Is the Audience?

The first step an organization needs to undertake for strategic communication is to identify its primary stakeholders. In part because of cost concerns, and in part because communication is seldom considered a strategic element in the organization, most research organizations have adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to science communication. The “one size” varies—sometimes, it means “dumbing down” messages and communication vehicles to be accessible to the least sophisticated possible audience members, sometimes it means sending out very technical information as it already is written, geared toward science- and technology-savvy information consumers with little or no translation. The dead giveaway for one-size-fits-all approaches like this is when a chief executive officer (CEO) or communication manager replies “the general public” when asked which audience the organization targets with its communication.

In reality, there is no such thing as a general public—there are many publics, each with its own information needs and its own orientation toward and relationship with the organization. Also, each audience has its preferred information-seeking behavior. Some may be motivated information seekers, such as stakeholders in a company contemplating a new technology launch or newly diagnosed cancer patients seeking medical information. For motivated information seekers, an organization needs to do little more than provide access to information—the seeker does whatever it takes to acquire, translate, and understand it.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading