Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

For those who explain developments in science, it is often essential to understand and communicate what it is that makes scientific inquiry distinctive. Science is different from other forms of investigation, such as philosophy or mathematics, though it often borrows from these and other disciplines. Traditionally, explaining what makes science unique involved explaining what was often described as the scientific method. This implies that there is a clearly defined set of procedures or strategies that distinguish scientific reasoning from other modes of inquiry. However, in recent years, those who write on the nature of science have realized that things are far more complicated and nuanced than originally thought. While it is clear that there are a variety of goals, methods, and practices that many scientists embrace, most commentators have come to treat the idea that there is a tidy, straightforward set of principles defining scientific method as a myth. To understand this, it will help to consider key historical events that ushered in modern scientific thought.

The Scientific Revolution

People have known about and adopted various dimensions of scientific investigation throughout human history. For example, Aristotle (384–322 BCE) offered detailed theories of physics, biology, and cosmology. However, for much of this history, science was not clearly distinguished from religious, philosophical, or magical reasoning. A significant shift took place with what is now commonly referred to as the Scientific Revolution, lasting from the 16th to the mid-18th centuries.

In 1543, Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) published a book challenging the dominant view that Earth is stationary and at the center of the universe. Instead of this geocentric picture, Copernicus insisted that various observations suggested the sun was at the center of the universe, orbited by Earth. Copernicus's theory encountered great resistance, in part because it implied that humans are not at the center of the cosmos; the Catholic Church banned the publishing of any books promoting heliocentrism. Nevertheless, the theory gained widespread acceptance by the mid-17th century. This was due in large measure to significant developments of the theory by astronomers such as Johannes Kepler (1571–1630).

While Kepler improved on the Copernican theory of planetary motion, Galileo Galilei (1564– 1642) introduced significant methodological changes that also influenced theory. By devising vast improvements on the telescope, Galileo went on to make a number of astronomical discoveries that confirmed the heliocentric model. Perhaps more importantly, Galileo developed a more comprehensive theory of natural motion that included terrestrial dynamics and that was also based on experimental observations. Galilean science heavily emphasized mathematics, especially geometry, as a method of modeling the dynamics of moving bodies. Because of his strong commitment to hypothesis testing and mathematical rigor in describing physical phenomena, many consider Galileo the first true modern physicist.

Further developments in physics stemmed from the contributions of thinkers such as Francis Bacon (1561–1626) and René Descartes (1596– 1650). Bacon reasserted the importance of Aristotle's inductive method, whereby the laws of nature are revealed through repeated observations. By contrast, Descartes's conception of knowledge famously deemphasized the role of observation while stressing the critical role of deductive reasoning from basic principles. Both men promoted “mechanism”—the idea that the physical world operates like a machine in which the behavior of complex physical systems is due to the lawlike behavior of constituent minute particles (“corpuscles”).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading