Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Public understanding of science (PUS) is simultaneously a passion, a problem, a paradigm, and a puzzle. It is a passion for many who find pleasure and value in communicating about science and technology with nonscientists. It is a problem for many professional scientists, educators, and policymakers, who are concerned that the public is insufficiently informed about science and technology. It is a paradigm for those commentators and critics who see it as an elitist and self-serving view of the relationship between science and the rest of society. And last but not least, it is a puzzle to be solved by increasing numbers of science communication specialists who research, publish, and teach in this area.

The phrase public understanding of science (PUS) is notoriously ambiguous. By the term public may be meant either various categories of people (often, groups of individuals acting in their capacities as citizens) or else an abstract space characterized by distinctive forms of deliberative social and political exchange (as in the phrase, “the public sphere”). By understanding may be meant various kinds of formal or informal knowledge, but also a wide range of other, more or less closely related constructs, including awareness, interest, attentiveness, and even sympathy. Finally, by science may be meant any or all of the particular sciences, the science-based technologies, and the processes of scientific inquiry (including idealizations such as the scientific method). Given the multiple possibilities inherent in each of these constituent terms, it is no surprise that the compound PUS has been the subject of much debate.

Historical Overview

Communication with the public about science is as old as science itself, but there was no clear focus on PUS per se before World War II, and few organized efforts were made in this area until the last quarter of the 20th century. In the United Kingdom, for example, distinguished natural philosophers and their admirers spoke and wrote for general audiences from as far back as the 17th century; and a number of specialized societies—including the Royal Institution of Great Britain and the British Association for the Advancement of Science—took up the cause of popularizing science in the late-18th and 19th centuries. In the 20th century, the field of professional science journalism grew rapidly, but it was not until the Royal Society of London convened a working group and then a committee on the subject, starting in the early 1980s, that PUS became the object of serious attention from the scientific community.

Developments similar to these in the United Kingdom took place in a number of other countries in Europe, Australasia, and North America. In the United States, for example, the years immediately after World War II saw commercial publishers, scientific societies, science journalists, and government agencies all working to popularize science in the interests of greater public understanding. Thus, in 1951, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) adopted a new policy statement that included among the association's objectives that of increasing “public understanding and appreciation” of the role of scientific method with respect to human progress. In the late-1980s, the AAAS convened a separate Committee on Public Understanding of Science and Technology, and since that time, initiatives in this area have proliferated widely.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading