Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term information subsidies refers to the process of providing news stories, reports, facts, or other forms of information or intellectual capital to reporters or gatekeepers, with the intention of affecting the perceptions or actions of readers, viewers, or recipients of the information. This information is subsidized by the producer, typically making it less costly to the user than it would be were the user to gather it on his or her own. In turn, the subsidizing agency generally expects to gain a higher degree of influence or power over information consumers as well as advantage over competing information sources than would ensue were they not to provide the subsidy. Information subsidies are particularly important for science and technology news.

The value of subsidized information depends on two factors: how it may reduce the uncertainty in future decision making and how useful, credible, or reliable the source is judged to be. Information subsidies are valuable commodities because they reduce the amount of time and expense that reporters would otherwise spend gathering information. Information subsidies also provide opportunities for corporations, governments, or other entities to present their positions and thereby are involved directly in the news-making process. The process of wielding influence through the provision of information subsidies has been described as agenda building.

In 1982, Oscar Gandy defined an information subsidy as an effort to influence others by providing information in a controlled manner at a lower cost than were users to collect it themselves. Researchers have suggested that anywhere from 15% to 80% of news content is derived from information subsides. Nevertheless, debate continues as to the degree to which information subsidies influence reporters and gatekeepers and to how they affect media content.

Agenda Setting

Agenda-setting theory suggests that the media agenda sets the public agenda, and the public agenda sets the policy agenda. The relationships among media agenda, public agenda, and policy agenda are circular or interactive rather than linear or directional relationships. Agenda-setting theory has been linked closely to research on media effects. Researchers have also correlated it with the development of public opinion and policy formation.

Researchers Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw, who pioneered research into the agenda-setting process, argued that the amount of coverage given to an issue is directly related to the public's interest and perception of its importance. They demonstrated a direct correlation between the value that the media placed on an issue and voters' interest. Based on their analysis of news coverage of the 1968 presidential campaign in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, these researchers identified this phenomenon as the media's agenda-setting function. Other researchers went a step farther, arguing that the media are responsible for creating a reality that is so powerful and pervasive that the public is unable to ignore its influence even when this is presented in a subtle manner. The perceived role and influence of information subsidies on media effects are reflective of these relationships. The argument is that social actors who provide the media with information subsidies have great influence on the process of agenda setting. This reinforces the idea that the media play a direct role in shaping public perception and policy and contends that information sources influence media content, and thus (in turn) both public perceptions and policy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading