Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Writing is the expression of ideas and feelings through the use of written symbols. Over the years, the rapid integration of technology into home and school environments has challenged traditional definitions of writing. Voice-activated software blurs the boundaries between oral and written language. While the mediating tools for writing are changing, the process of coding experiences into symbols (words) to provide meaning continues to be central to written expression. The writer remains the essential catalyst. Critical to evaluating a student's writing abilities is an understanding of the writer's background experiences (school and home), as well as emotional, cognitive, and linguistic abilities.

A growing number of students in our school systems are experiencing difficulty with written expression. The etiology of these problems is certainly not singular and often is the result of a mixture of factors. The source of underachievement in written expression for some students rests with thinking or oral language abilities. Learning to organize experiences or transforming ideas to oral language is the key instructional goal for such individuals (e.g., language or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). Other students are fluent in developing ideas and demonstrate adequate oral language abilities. However, the breakdown for these students might be in the coding of oral language into written symbols (e.g., dyslexia). Students demonstrating significant social cognition problems (e.g., autism, Asperger's disorder) encounter problems with a sense of audience. Motivational or anxiety problems surrounding the process of writing can interfere with fluency and quality of text for any student. In addition, students coming from different cultures, as well as those for whom English is their second language can struggle with aspects of writing. Writing is much more than just spelling and handwriting, yet it is often “… taught [and assessed] as a motor skill and not as a complex cultural activity” (Vygotksy, 1978, p. 34).

What are You Measuring?

A key to any assessment of writing is an understanding of the influence of the task demands, the tools used for responding, and the topic. Before critical decisions are formed related to a student's potential and/or ability, this information should be put into proper perspective. Often discrepant performance across measures purporting to evaluate a specific writing skill (e.g., spelling) is not the result of a student's motivation or the psychometrics of a measure. The task, the topic, or the tool demands may be very different across two measures of a single skill.

Task

Two essential aspects of a task that should be considered are the modality and degree of structure. It is important to recognize that modalities are not the same as cognitive processes (e.g., memory, executive functioning, attention). Modalities represent the sensory channels through which information is perceived. Modality representation cannot be isolated from the nature of the task. The four modalities commonly represented across writing measures are:

  • Auditory, representing information heard or spoken
  • Visual, representing information seen or written
  • Haptic, involving touch (tracing or feeling an object)
  • Motor, dealing with movement

An examiner should consider the input and output modalities of a task. For instance, a spelling task might be dictated to a writer (auditory–verbal), but the output requires writing the correct word (motor–verbal). In addition, the information presented can be either verbal (spoken or written) or nonverbal (pictures, environmental sounds).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading