Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Much has changed since multicultural education first became a “hot topic” for researchers, educators, and parents. What we know today about multicultural education is very different from what we knew in the past. The United States, as well as many other countries, has evolved into a country rich with diversity among its people, their cultures, and their backgrounds. Students in today's schools come from homes of different economic, linguistic, religious, and ethnic traditions. The National Center for Educational Statistics reported that in 2000 39% of the students in U.S. schools were considered part of a minority group, and in many parts of the country the percentages were much higher. Conditions of poverty, community violence and crime, societal and individual prejudice, and racism continue to create additional challenges for students trying to learn. While the diversity of the U.S. school population is growing, many students from these backgrounds are being left behind academically. In addition, the reliance on high-stakes tests, such as state standards tests, widens the gaps in academic achievement for diverse groups. This is one of the key reasons that applying multicultural education in schools is so important.

Multicultural educators and researchers have long debated the definitions, meanings, goals and approaches of multicultural education. Banks and Banks (2001) and Sleeter and Grant (1999) have written much about multicultural education. The works of these authors are described here because they offer useful definitions, descriptions of different understandings and approaches, and discussion of their relative strengths and shortcomings as the approaches are used in schools.

Banks and Banks (2001), two of the leading figures in the field of multicultural education, propose that multicultural education is at least three things: an idea or concept, an educational reform movement, and a process. They say that multicultural education incorporates the belief that all students, regardless of gender, social class, ethnicity, or culture, should have an equal opportunity to learn. Korn and Bursztyn (2002) add that multicultural education is a way to fill the gap between the cultures of home and school with multicultural curricula. Sleeter and Grant (1999) use the term multicultural education to encompass educational practices directed toward issues of race, culture, language, social class, gender, disability, racism, classism, and sexism.

Much like the definition of multicultural education, there is a debate about its goal(s). The consensus among most scholars and researchers appears to be that the major goal of multicultural education is to address the inequality in education by promoting an understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity (Davidman & Davidman, 1994).

Contributions of Banks and Banks

Banks (1994) states that there is general agreement among most multicultural education scholars and researchers that institutional changes must be made for multicultural education to be implemented successfully (e.g., changes in curricula, teaching materials, learning styles, attitudes, and school culture). He articulates five dimensions of multicultural education (see Table 1) that describe the different ways to accomplish the goal of multicultural education.

Of Banks's five dimensions of multicultural education, content integration is the most common approach used in schools today. Table 2 shows examples of each approach of content integration, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The contributions approach, the most widely used in schools, is easy to integrate without changing the structure and goals of the mainstream curriculum, and knowledge can be spread quickly (Banks & Banks, 2001). However, numerous disadvantages outweigh the advantages of this approach. A major disadvantage is that curriculum remains unchanged or unaltered, thus it leads to only telling “half of the story.” Content is limited to special months and holidays without regard for important concepts and issues related to oppression and struggles of diverse groups. Students may end up studying the strange and exotic characteristics of diverse cultures, which may reinforce stereotypes and misconceptions (Banks & Banks, 2001). For example, heroes and heroines who are more radical and less conforming, such as Malcolm X and The Black Panthers, are often overlooked and therefore “invisible” in this stage of integration.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading