Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Structural equation modeling (SEM) belongs to the class of statistical analyses that examines the relations among multiple variables (both exogenous and endogenous). The methodology can be viewed as a combination of three statistical techniques: multiple regression, path analysis, and factor analysis. It has the purpose of determining the extent to which a proposed theoretical model, which is often expressed by a set of relations among different constructs, is supported by the collected data. SEM is, therefore, a technique for confirmatory instead of exploratory analysis. This entry represents a nonmathematical introduction to SEM, with an emphasis on its benefits, usage, and basic underlying assumptions. Principal concepts related to the methodology and summarized comparisons with other multivariate analyses are also presented. Then, the entry outlines and discusses a pragmatic six-step framework to carry out the SEM statistical analysis. Advances in SEM with respect to the relaxation of its fundamental assumptions conclude the entry.

Principal Concepts

Essentially, SEM statistically tests hypotheses of multiple relations among measured variables. As depicted in Figure 1, the conceptual variables or constructs are denominated latent variables. Hence, SEM models these qualitative relations among the latent variables and then tests the extent to which these relations explain the data according to a fit criterion. In many cases, the latent variables cannot be directly observed and are further specified and estimated through the measurements of underlying variables (the Xs and Ys in Figure 1). Besides, through the model's latent variables and their underlying measured variables, SEM can explicitly account for measurement errors.

In general, two distinct but interconnected models lie within a single SEM analysis: a measurement model, aimed to evaluate the extent to which the measured (underlying) variables effectively capture the concepts (or constructs) in the model; and a structural model, aimed to simultaneously test all the causal relations (i.e., the links among the constructs) found in the overall SEM model. It should be noted that the consistency of the causal relations among the latent variables does not rely on the confirmatory testing but on the theoretical support of the model proposed.

SEM has its origins from several different multivariate methods. On one side, the measurement model originates from a much broader category of factor analysis. This statistical technique is often used to study patterns within a set of variables, with the objective to identify their underlying structure. These groupings of variables are known as factors. Initial development of factor analysis came from Charles E. Spearman in 1904 by his work on the identification of underlying structure of mental abilities.

Factor analysis is generally considered an exploratory technique. On the contrary, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) requires a priori assumptions about the structure of the variables and serves the a purpose similar to that of the measurement model in SEM framework.

The second constituent, path analysis, corresponds to the structural model within SEM analysis. It allows a researcher to model complex relationships among various variables and visually represents them in a path diagram. Path analysis compares the regression weights obtained from a proposed causal model to the correlations obtained from the data, and estimates the fit of the data to the proposed model.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading