Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Q methodology is a combination of conceptual framework, technique of data collection, and method of analysis that collectively provides the basis for the scientific study of subjectivity. This is distinguished from R methodology, which provides the basis for the study of what is objective in human behavior. Innovated in the mid-1930s by British physicist–psychologist William Stephenson, Q methodology focuses on opinions and perspectives that are gathered using the well-known Q-sort technique. These data are then submitted to factor analysis, pioneered by Stephenson's mentor Charles Spearman, which reveals the segmentation of subjectivity inherent in the substantive domain under consideration. Given the ubiquity of subjectivity, Q methodology applies to all areas of human endeavor—social attitudes, decision making, administration, the arts and humanities, cultural values, policy, economics, education, and so on, and including the natural and physical sciences insofar as subjective substructures undergird the theories and understandings used to explain objective facts. The focus on subjectivity in Q methodology requires departures from conventional applications of sampling, experimental design, and factor analysis. This entry provides information on the conceptual framework, data collection, and analysis of Q methodology, along with resources for additional information.

Concourse of Subjective Communicability

Q methodology has its roots in concourse, a term coined by Stephenson that refers to the universe of subjective communicability surrounding any topic, of the kind found in ordinary conversation, back-fence gossip, commentary deposited on Internet blogs and exchanged in chat rooms, and extending to the high-level discourses of epistemic communities across all the sciences. Facts are invariably interlaced with opinions, and the division between the two turns on the principle of self-reference, its absence in R methodology and its centrality in Q. Hence, it is one thing to state that “free-flying wild birds can be a source of avian influenza,” which is a matter of fact, and another to assert that “scientific surveillance of wild birds should be maintained worldwide,” which is an opinion. The latter is self-referential to those who assert it, and it is apt to be accompanied by other opinions from the same concourse—for example, that “compartmentalization would reduce risk for introduction of AI viruses via trade,” that “there is an immediate need to promote international research programs to develop better vaccines,” and so forth.

The volume of opinion constitutes the universe of communicability that, in principle, is infinite in magnitude. Unlike sampling in surveys, where population boundaries can be specified and the number of cases is finite, the boundaries of communicability cannot be fixed and its content is limitless. Concourse is not restricted to statements of opinion. The population of impressionist art also constitutes a concourse, as do the universes of novels, musical compositions, political cartoons, landscapes, and flavors of ice cream; in short, any collection of stimuli, linguistic or otherwise, for which individuals might express preferences. A defining feature of concourse is that its contents are generally untestable and incapable of falsification; however, they remain subject to measurement.

Q-Sample Structuring and Experimental Design

Concourses are typically voluminous, as are person populations in survey research, and one of the steps in Q methodology involves reducing the concourse to a small sample of statements suitable for experimentation. As an illustration, consider the following statements, which were among more than 200 drawn from the media and interviews prior to the 2003 U.S. war with

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading