Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Occam's Razor

Occam's Razor (also spelled Ockham) is known as the principle of parsimony or the economy of hypotheses. It is a philosophical principle dictating that, all things being equal, simplicity is preferred over complexity. Traditionally, the Razor has been used as a philosophical heuristic for choosing between competing theories, but the principle is also useful for defining methods for empirical inquiry, selecting scientific hypotheses, and refining statistical models. According to Occam's Razor, a tool with fewer working parts ought to be selected over one with many, provided they are equally functional. Likewise, a straightforward explanation ought to be believed over one that requires many separate contingencies.

For instance, there are a number of possible reasons why a light bulb does not turn on when a switch is flipped: Aliens could have abducted the light bulb, the power could be out, or the filament within the bulb has burned out. The explanation requiring aliens is exceedingly complex, as it necessitates the existence of an unknown life form, a planet from which they have come, a motive for taking light bulbs, and so on. A power outage is not as complicated, but still requires an intricate chain of events, such as a storm, accident, or engineering problem. The simplest of these theories is that the light bulb has simply burned out. All theories provide explanations, but vary in complexity. Until proof corroborating one account surfaces, Occam's Razor requires that the simplest explanation be preferred above the others. Thus, the logical—and most likely correct—hypothesis is that the light bulb has burned out.

This entry begins with a brief history of Occam's Razor. It then discusses the implications for research. The entry concludes with some caveats related to the use of Occam's Razor.

History

Occam's Razor is named for the 14th-century English theologian, philosopher, and friar William of Occam. William, who was presumably from the city of Occam, famously suggested that “entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.” To do so, he explained, implied vanity and needlessly increased the chances of error. This principle had been formalized since the time of Aristotle, but Occam's unabashed and consistent use of the Razor helped Occam become one of the foremost critics of Thomas Aquinas.

Implications for Scientific Research

The reasons for emphasizing simplicity when conceptualizing and conducting research may seem obvious. Simple designs reduce the chance of experimenter error, increase the clarity of the results, obviate needlessly complex statistical analyses, conserve valuable resources, and curtail potential confounds. As such, the Razor can be a helpful guide when attempting to produce an optimal research design. Although often implemented intuitively, it may be helpful to review and refine proposed research methods with the Razor in mind.

Just as any number of tools can be used to accomplish a particular job, there are many potential methodological designs for each research question. Occam's Razor suggests that a tool with fewer working parts is preferable to one that is needlessly complicated. A correlation design that necessitates only examining government records may be more appropriate than an experimental design that necessitates recruiting, assigning, manipulating, and debriefing participants. If both designs would yield the same conclusion, Occam's Razor dictates that the simpler correlation design should be used.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading