Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Friedman Test

In an attempt to control for unwanted variability, researchers often implement designs that pair or group participants into subsets based on common characteristics (e.g., randomized block design) or implement designs that observe the same participant across a series of conditions (e.g., repeated-measures design). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a common statistical method used to analyze data from a randomized block or repeated-measures design. However, the assumption of normality that underlies ANOVA is often violated, or the scale of measurement for the dependent variable is ordinal-level, hindering the use of ANOVA. To address this situation, economist Milton Friedman developed a statistical test based on ranks that may be applied to data from randomized block or repeated measures designs where the purpose is to detect differences across two or more conditions. This entry describes this statistical test, named the Friedman Test, which may be used in lieu of ANOVA. The Friedman test is classified as a non-parametric test because it does not require a specific distributional assumption. A primary advantage of the Friedman test is that it can be applied more widely as compared to ANOVA.

Procedure

The Friedman test is used to analyze several related (i.e., dependent) samples. Friedman referred to his procedure as the method of ranks in that it is based on replacing the original scores with rank-ordered values. Consider a study in which data are collected within a randomized block design where N blocks are observed over K treatment conditions on a dependent measure that is at least ordinal-level. The first step in the Friedman test is to replace the original scores with ranks, denoted Rjk, within each block; that is, the scores for block j are compared with each other, and a rank of 1 is assigned to the smallest observed score, a rank of 2 is assigned to the second smallest, and so on until the largest value is replaced by a rank of K. In the situation where there are ties within a block (i.e., two or more of the values are identical), the midrank is used. The midrank is the average of the ranks that would have been assigned if there were no ties. Note that this procedure generalizes to a repeated measures design in that the ranks are based on within-participant observations (or, one can think of the participants as defining the blocks). Table 1 presents the ranked data in tabular form.

None

It is apparent that row means in Table 1 (i.e., mean of ranks for each block) are the same across blocks; however, the column means (i.e., mean of ranks within a treatment condition) will be affected by differences across treatment conditions. Under the null hypothesis that there is no difference due to treatment, the ranks are assigned at random, and thus, an equal frequency of ranks would be expected for each treatment condition. Therefore, if there is no treatment effect, then the column means are expected to be the same for each treatment condition. The null hypothesis may be specified as follows:

None

To test the null hypothesis that there is no treatment effect, the following test statistic may be

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading