Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Decision Rule

In the context of statistical hypothesis testing, decision rule refers to the rule that specifies how to choose between two (or more) competing hypotheses about the observed data. A decision rule specifies the statistical parameter of interest, the test statistic to calculate, and how to use the test statistic to choose among the various hypotheses about the data. More broadly, in the context of statistical decision theory, a decision rule can be thought of as a procedure for making rational choices given uncertain information.

The choice of a decision rule depends, among other things, on the nature of the data, what one needs to decide about the data, and at what level of significance. For instance, decision rules used for normally distributed (or Gaussian) data are generally not appropriate for non-Gaussian data. Similarly, decision rules used for determining the 95% confidence interval of the sample mean will be different from the rules appropriate for binary decisions, such as determining whether the sample mean is greater than a prespecified mean value at a given significance level. As a practical matter, even for a given decision about a given data set, there is no unique, universally acceptable decision rule but rather many possible principled rules.

There are two main statistical approaches to picking the most appropriate decision rule for a given decision. The classical, or frequentist, approach is the one encountered in most textbooks on statistics and the one used by most researchers in their data analyses. This approach is generally quite adequate for most types of data analysis. The Bayesian approach is still widely considered esoteric, but one that an advanced researcher should become familiar with, as this approach is becoming increasingly common in advanced data analysis and complex decision making.

Decision Rules in Classical Hypothesis Testing

Suppose one needs to decide whether a new brand of bovine growth hormone increases the body weight of cattle beyond the known average value of μ kilograms. The observed data consist of body weight measurements from a sample of cattle treated with the hormone. The default explanation for the data, or the null hypothesis, is that there is no effect: the mean weight of the treated sample is no greater than the nominal mean μ. The alternative hypothesis is that the mean weight of the treated sample is greater than μ.

The decision rule specifies how to decide which of the two hypotheses to accept, given the data. In the present case, one may calculate the t statistic, determine the critical value of t at the desired level of significance (such as .05), and accept the alternative hypothesis if the t value based on the data exceeds the critical value and reject it otherwise. If the sample is sufficiently large and Gaussian, one might use a similar decision rule with a different test statistic, the z score. Alternatively, one may choose between the hypotheses based on the p value rather than the critical value.

Such case-specific variations notwithstanding, what all frequentist decision rules have in common is that they arrive at a decision ultimately by comparing some statistic of the observed data against a theoretical standard, such as the sampling distribution of the statistic, and determine how likely the observed data are under the various competing hypotheses.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading