Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Action Research

Action research differs from conventional research methods in three fundamental ways. First, its primary goal is social change. Second, members of the study sample accept responsibility for helping resolve issues that are the focus of the inquiry. Third, relationships between researcher and study participants are more complex and less hierarchical. Most often, action research is viewed as a process of linking theory and practice in which scholar-practitioners explore a social situation by posing a question, collecting data, and testing a hypothesis through several cycles of action. The most common purpose of action research is to guide practitioners as they seek to uncover answers to complex problems in disciplines such as education, health sciences, sociology, or anthropology. Action research is typically underpinned by ideals of social justice and an ethical commitment to improve the quality of life in particular social settings. Accordingly, the goals of action research are as unique to each study as participants’ contexts; both determine the type of data-gathering methods that will be used. Because action research can embrace natural and social science methods of scholarship, its use is not limited to either positivist or heuristic approaches. It is, as John Dewey pointed out, an attitude of inquiry rather than a single research methodology.

This entry presents a brief history of action research, describes several critical elements of action research, and offers cases for and against the use of action research.

Historical Development

Although not officially credited with authoring the term action research, Dewey proposed five phases of inquiry that parallel several of the most commonly used action research processes, including curiosity, intellectualization, hypothesizing, reasoning, and testing hypotheses through action. This recursive process in scientific investigation is essential to most contemporary action research models. The work of Kurt Lewin is often considered seminal in establishing the credibility of action research. In anthropology, William Foote Whyte conducted early inquiry using an action research process similar to Lewin's. In health sciences, Reginald Revans renamed the process action learning while observing a process of social action among nurses and coal miners in the United Kingdom. In the area of emancipatory education, Paulo Freire is acknowledged as one of the first to undertake action research characterized by participant engagement in sociopolitical activities.

The hub of the action research movement shifted from North America to the United Kingdom in the late 1960s. Lawrence Stenhouse was instrumental in revitalizing its use among health care practitioners. John Elliott championed a form of educational action research in which the researcher-as-participant takes increased responsibility for individual and collective changes in teaching practice and school improvement. Subsequently, the 1980s were witness to a surge of action research activity centered in Australia. Wilfred Carr and Stephen Kemmis authored Becoming Critical, and Kemmis and Robin McTaggart's The Action Research Planner informed much educational inquiry. Carl Glickman is often credited with a renewed North American interest in action research in the early 1990s. He advocated action research as a way to examine and implement principles of democratic governance; this interest coincided with an increasing North American appetite for postmodern methodologies such as personal inquiry and biographical narrative.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading