Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Rhetoric is the “art” of persuasion, of convincing the hearer or reader of a particular line of argumentation. Handbooks of classical rhetoric constitute a codification of practically any expression possible in words. At the same time, classical rhetoric is based on an engagement with the audience as recipient and recognizes that the situatedness of communication includes the writer/speaker, the audience, and text.

Together with grammar and dialectic, rhetoric formed part of the ancient trivium that was the basis of education from ancient times until well into the 19th century. However, as early as the 16th century, rhetoric began a period of progressive narrowing and decline until it fell into complete abeyance. During recent times, the power, complexity, and subtlety of rhetoric as a feature of all discourse and of persuading a particularly constituted audience has produced, among other things, a view of all texts as representations that are the product of the reworkings of other texts and an understanding of the research practices of human inquiry as essentially rhetorical.

An approach to data in terms of genre, difference, definition, division of an assertion into its parts, etymology, and comparison corresponds to the “places” or “topics” of rhetoric that operate as potential guides to choices, possibilities, and alternative ways of thinking about data. When, for example, a qualitative researcher thinks about the kind of questions that will obtain “rich” data, he or she is engaging with the first step of rhetoric—invention. Integral to further steps of rhetoric are models of organization, arrangement, contiguity, and amplification. The latter, for example can take several modes such as providing examples, the use of icons, visual devices (e.g., diagrams), concordant authorities and theories, cause and effect, and detailed description and repetition with modifications.

Much of the data of qualitative research is in the form of partial situated knowledge from which the researcher, in the process of analysis, moves from the known to the unknown, abstracting some distinguishing mark or governing metaphor. Metaphor is one of the main figures or tropes of rhetoric. However, this is not to say that rhetoric can be mapped directly onto qualitative method; rather, it serves to deepen the researcher's thinking about the possibilities of representation in terms of style, the articulation of knowledge, and the production of rational modes of inquiry based on different argumentative structures.

DerekPigrum

Further Readings

Barthes, R. (1988). The semiotic challenge (R.Howard, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fernandez, J. W. (Ed.). (1991). Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gross, A. G. (1996). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1971). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J.Wilkinson, & P.Weaver, Trans.). London: Notre Dame Press.
Ricouer, P. (2003). The rule of metaphor: Creation of meaning in language (R.Czerny, Trans.). London: Routledge.
White, H. (1985). Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading