Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Publication refers to the act of circulating written results in order to disseminate and communicate these findings within academic and/or professional circles, or the broader public. Increasingly, scholarly publications are distributed electronically as well as in print. For researchers outside of academia, publications may be reports, articles in professional journals, or other avenues that disseminate research to colleagues, agencies, government institutions, or related bodies. For researchers within academia, the quality and sustainability of individuals, departments, and universities is largely based on publications in international refereed journals and books. A central part of being an academic researcher is publishing and disseminating results, often encapsulated in the mantra “publish or perish.” Publication prowess is furthermore often tied to funding opportunities and resource allocation in addition to providing substantial returns in terms of career mobility and recognition. This entry defines the central features of publishing and publications, with a focus on academia.

The Writing and Publishing Process

Publishing begins with the writing process, which should be based on clarity. Numerous articles and books can aid researchers in producing high quality manuscripts (see Further Readings). It is also essential to avoid fundamental mistakes like spelling errors, follow standard style guidelines (available from general texts such as William Strunk and Elwyn Brooks White's The Elements of Style), and keep the level of competence of readers in mind. Finally, avoid numerous footnotes or endnotes, write concisely and logically, remain focused, and show a command of the secondary literature.

To achieve success, it is advisable to first engage in an internal review (advisors, coworkers, discussion groups), look for a suitable journal or publisher, and submit a professional manuscript. After the manuscript has been submitted, it is generally sent for peer review and often undergoes a double-blind review process (i.e., both author and reviewers are anonymous). This process of peer review and revision is intended to maintain the quality of the publication; however, some have argued that peer review is more reminiscent of a lottery than a rational process, or (at worst) a process that forces authors to “sell their souls” by editing to suit others' intentions or risk not being published at all. Authors are then informed of the editorial decision, receive comments, and if the article has received a “revise and resubmit,” have the opportunity to revise the manuscript. If the revised article is accepted, it is usually copyedited prior to being typeset and distributed through print and digital means.

The Citation and Journal Impact Factor Indexes

In the increasingly competitive academic system, the journal impact factor and citation indexes have emerged as the central evaluation device in many academic institutions across most disciplines. These tools were developed by Eugene Garfield and presented in his 1955 paper, “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation Through Association of Ideas.” Quantitative and seemingly more objective indicators in the form of journal impact factors and citation indices were developed as a practical and cost-effect tool to serve these evaluation goals. Evaluation often takes place using publication counts, number of citations, and the prestige of journals.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading