Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Interdisciplinary research integrates perspectives and methods from two or more disciplines to investigate a topic or an issue. It has been distinguished from multidisciplinary research in which individuals and teams trained in different academic traditions focus on a common problem but are not charged with integrating concepts and methods to address that problem. It has also been distinguished from, or regarded as a sub-type of, transdisciplinary research where diverse researchers attempt to transcend disciplinary boundaries to create novel ways of thinking about the topic of interest and to advance methods of investigation. Although interdisciplinary research has a long history, it has gained prominence recently due to the “big science” revolution that encourages and funds large, interdisciplinary, and multimethod research and to technological advances that enhance conceptual and methodological integration. Increasingly, researchers, funders, and policymakers have come to recognize that multiple perspectives and methods are needed to better understand and solve complicated issues. The added value of interdisciplinary approaches has been demonstrated in research on a range of complex questions such as the effects of poverty on child and family well-being; the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research; health and health behaviors; and the multiple interlinked influences on child development (e.g., biological, environmental, familial, community, cultural). These are complicated phenomena that require a matching complexity and integration of methods at multiple levels for their study.

Although much has been written about the value of interdisciplinary research and its correlate mixed methods, there is little available about the actual practice and use of qualitative methods in interdisciplinary projects—the ways in which large and diverse research teams have integrated qualitative approaches, the transformations that qualitative methods can bring about, and the real challenges that exist for qualitative methodologists working on interdisciplinary teams or for researchers on the team who are not trained in the methods. Research findings are reported with varying degrees of success at integrating qualitative perspectives and methods, but the activities that lay behind successful or unsuccessful integration are not transparent. This entry provides a brief synopsis of the potential of qualitative methods in collaborative interdisciplinary research and the factors that enhance or impede integration.

The Potential of Qualitative Methods

Increasingly, different disciplines are adopting qualitative methods as one means to investigate pertinent research questions. Until very recently, researchers in fields such as sociology, psychology, education, nursing, and public health were suspect or marginalized if they wanted to employ ethnographic or interview methods in their studies. Although these views have not dissipated entirely, there is more appreciation for the depth of understanding that qualitative methods can bring to interdisciplinary research. If employed at all phases of the research project, from research design through sampling, data collection, analysis, and report writing, qualitative methods can suggest new lines of inquiry, new foci of investigation, alternative statistical models, and novel interpretations of complex phenomena. Methods such as participant observation, semi-structured interviews, document analysis, life histories, and case studies bring other disciplinary perspectives to a research team by their mere introduction. For example, an explanatory or cultural models type of interview can elicit individuals' ideas about disease causation, symptoms, prognosis, and treatment and can be used in clinic and research settings. There have also been a number of interdisciplinary studies of poverty and child and family well-being that use qualitative approaches. Sociological questionnaires and psychological assessments have provided important information on correlations among societal, familial, and individual variables, but ethnographic research and case studies add holistic accounts of how low-income families raise their children and make ends meet in contexts of limited resources and poverty programs. In addition, they bring theoretical perspectives from their anthropological or sociological origins, such as theories of inequality and social justice, that can be used in interpreting or contextualizing findings from other methods.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading