Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Cognitive interviewing encompasses a variety of approaches for eliciting qualitative data on how participants interpret and respond to a wide variety of situations. Cognitive interviewing increasingly is used in the evaluation of technology interfaces such as websites and tools for informatics. It is used in education to understand how students think about content and respond to test items and in marketing to understand how to evaluate products better. This entry focuses on an especially salient application of cognitive interviewing for researchers in varied disciplines—the development of structured questionnaire and interview items.

Beginning in the late 1970s, cognitive interviewing developed through the interdisciplinary efforts of cognitive psychologists and survey design methodologists. The intent of these interdisciplinary collaborations was to study the cognitive processes that shape participants' responses to questions and to use cognitive theory to improve survey design. Cognitive interviewing increasingly is viewed as an essential aspect of developing valid and reliable standardized measures. Through cognitive interviews with members of the target population for a new measure, researchers are able to identify problems with question interpretation as well as understand the kinds of information participants use in formulating their responses. Cognitive interviewing also provides insights into participants' decisions to respond to questionnaire items in a particular way. As a distinct form of qualitative interviewing, cognitive interviewing makes important contributions to instrument development and survey design.

Problems Addressed by Cognitive Interviewing

Cognitive interviews are used to identify a variety of potential problems with items of structured instruments. Gordon Willis and colleagues identified key cognitive processes involved in responding to questionnaires that were potentially problematic: comprehension, retrieval, judgment, and response. Problems of comprehension are related to respondents' understanding of the item and whether or not that understanding is in keeping with the investigator's intent. Sophisticated or overly technical language and lengthy complex questions can pose a threat to respondents' ability to understand items. In other instances, respondents may understand the item but in an unintended way. For example, the item may ask about respondents' beliefs about health promotion with the intent of eliciting information on what sorts of things are linked to a healthy lifestyle, but respondents may interpret the item as asking how religious beliefs contribute to health. Problems of retrieval are related to respondents being able to recall certain information or experiences. For example, respondents may understand the question but have no memories of their experiences or opinions on the issue. Issues of judgment relate to respondents' decisions about what information to provide and how to frame their answers. For example, if the question relates to a sensitive topic, participants may respond in a socially desirable way that does not reflect their actual experiences or opinions. Response problems have to do with how respondents fit their experiences and opinions into the response format of the questionnaire. As noted by Chris McQuiston and colleagues, members of certain cultural and ethnic groups have considerable difficulty in translating their experiences and opinions into a Likert scale response set. Cognitive interviewing is useful in helping the investigator to uncover the nature and extent of all these measurement problems.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading