Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term auditing refers to a systematic review of processes involved in decisions or actions. Typically, this is done to ensure conformation with accepted standards or to validate the accuracy of results. In qualitative research, auditing serves a comparable purpose and can be a valuable means of demonstrating the rigor of an investigation. Such a review offers a strong defense against criticisms that are sometimes posed in regard to qualitative research such as questions regarding the researcher's neutrality. Auditing of the study, therefore, is a useful means of supporting the credibility and trustworthiness of findings and interpretations in qualitative research.

There continues to be debate over the most appropriate ways in which to demonstrate credibility or rigor in a qualitative study. Auditing is not an essential part of the process of qualitative research. It can, however, be a useful mechanism to address quality aspects of a study. Many variations of auditing are available for qualitative researchers to apply in their projects. It is important that plans for an audit be addressed early in the design of a project so that the process can be incorporated in the manner that is most appropriate to each study. This entry describes the ways in which auditing can be conducted in qualitative research, including both internal and external audits and the timing of the auditing process. It also reviews the materials needed for an audit trail.

Methods of Auditing in Qualitative Research

Auditing of a qualitative study involves oversight and, at a minimum, review of the conduct of the study and the conclusions developed by investigators. There are numerous ways in which an audit can be carried out in a qualitative study. Variations include who serves as auditor, when the auditing process is initiated, how often auditing occurs, and the extent of the actual audit.

Internal Auditing

Auditing can be conducted on an internal basis in which members of the research team provide a system of checks and balances for each other. This process can promote consistency in the research process and can serve to identify, and subsequently decrease, the bias of any particular team members involved in the research. An internal audit can involve an exchange of documentation for review by other members of the team who can examine decisions and analytic processes associated with the research. An internal audit may be very useful in multisite studies where it is important to ensure consistency in the research process across the various settings. These activities enhance the research but might not provide sufficient evidence of rigor as is typically sought through a more formal or external audit.

External Auditing

Auditing conducted on an external basis involves formal and systematic review carried out by people with no vested interest or involvement in the conduct of the research. An external auditor typically is a researcher who is knowledgeable in the processes of qualitative research and who may or may not have expertise in the subject matter involved in the research. In the typical qualitative study, auditing can be accomplished quite easily by enlisting the assistance of an experienced yet objective colleague, with the investigator presenting and defending decision making to that individual. The colleague also can review raw data, notes, logs, journals, and other materials associated with the study. This process is referred to as peer debriefing, although it accomplishes the same goal as an audit.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading