Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The War on Terror continues to garner attention from the media and numerous individuals and organizations that have a vested interest in its outcome. This was brought to the forefront with former President George W. Bush declaring the War on Terror, against al-Qaeda, an international alliance of Islamic militant terrorist organizations founded in 1988 and led by Osama bin Laden. Al-Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in various countries and is said to be responsible for the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States, which prompted the president to make his declaration. Al-Qaeda has also been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department. Following President Bush's declaration, the U.S. government launched a military and intelligence campaign against al-Qaeda. The War on Terror is not an exclusive label attached to the military response, but rather it is the action addressing the prevention, detection, and response to acts of terrorism. This entry examines issues brought forth because of the War on Terror and ways in which race has played an integral part in the outcomes of the War on Terror.

Legislation

On September 18, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists ([AUMF] Public Law 107–40). The AUMF allowed the president to use whatever means necessary to bring those responsible for terrorism to justice. This allowed the U.S. Armed Forces to actively engage in the War on Terror, which in this case meant declaring war on Iraq. However, the engagement against Iraq was not the only result of the president's declaration against the War on Terror; it has also led to additional legislation and court cases, and it has created much controversy.

One of the most notable pieces of legislation that emerged in the War on Terror is the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT Act) of 2001, which was passed by Congress just 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with very limited debate. Critics of the Patriot Act point to significant flaws in this legislation, including threats to fundamental freedoms resulting from government access to medical records, tax records, and library user records about the books bought or borrowed, without probable cause. They have also criticized the authorization of governmental searches of homes without notification that the search was carried out. However, two provisions of the Patriot Act that allowed such searches and intelligence gathering were subsequently struck down on the grounds that they violated the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The PATRIOT Act was reauthorized by two subsequent bills. The first, the Patriot and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005, reauthorized provisions of the PATRIOT Act and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. It created new provisions dealing with the death penalty for terrorists, the enhancement of security at seaports, new measures to combat the financing of terrorism, new powers for the Secret Service, and a number of other miscellaneous provisions. The second reauthorization act amended the first and was passed in 2006. Patriot Act II expanded the reach of government agencies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading