Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

America's forefathers wanted to ensure that the principle “all men were created equal” would be a cornerstone of American society. But it took numerous amendments to the Constitution, a civil war, extensive legislation, and significant Supreme Court decisions to ensure that equality applied to all men and women. Racism in America has taken many forms. A keystone to equality is ensuring that the justice system is blind to all factors that could jeopardize liberty and freedom. Every defendant has the right to due process, a fair trial, and to be judged by a jury of his or her peers. When racism restricts the eligibility of any group of citizens from being included in a potential jury pool (venire) or serving on a jury, there cannot be a fair trial and justice will not prevail. When the court decided Norris v. State of Alabama in 1935, it played a key role in ensuring that all citizens' constitutional rights were protected in America.

The Facts

In March 1931, nine Black youths were arrested and eight were convicted of the charge of rape in Jackson County, Alabama. The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the conviction of one youth, but affirmed the convictions of seven others, including Clarence Norris (Powell v. Alabama, 1932). The U.S. Supreme Court heard the case and reversed the convictions for violations of due process of law “upon the grounds that the trial court had failed in the light of the circumstances disclosed, and of the inability of the defendants at the time to obtain counsel, to make an effective appointment of counsel to aid them in preparing and presenting their defense.”

After remand to the trial court, the judge granted a motion for a change of venue and the trial was moved to Morgan County, Alabama. The defendant then made a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that Blacks had been excluded from juries in Jackson County. There was also a motion to quash the trial venire in Morgan County because of the exclusion of Blacks from juries. (The venire is the group of citizens called for possible jury duty from whom the jury will be selected.) The exclusion of Blacks from the jury process is a violation of the defendant's constitutional guarantee of due process. The trial judge denied the two motions. Norris was convicted and sentenced to death. Upon appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court, the conviction was affirmed. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case based on a federal question and granted a writ of certiorari.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Carter v. Texas (1900), had confirmed that it is a violation of the Constitution when race is the basis for exclusion of a group of citizens from grand jury service. The court stated that

whenever by any action of a state, whether through its Legislature, through its courts, or through its executive or administrations officers, all persons of the African race are excluded, solely because of their race or color, from serving as grand jurors in the criminal prosecution of a person of the African race, the equal protection of the laws is denied to him, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. (Carter, at

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading