Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Children in American society have, historically, been regarded as innocent beings who are still at a relatively early stage of their development and are behaviorally, cognitively, and emotionally immature. Society is keen to impute to children all of the characteristics that are believed to represent the vulnerable nature of childhood—goodness, inexperience, and blamelessness; consequently, when children violate the law, social sensibilities are offended. It is inconceivable that one so young could commit so horrendous an act as robbery, rape, or murder. Yet juveniles (as the law regards those who have not yet reached the age of majority in a given jurisdiction) commit crimes varying from the more trivial (such as truancy or petty vandalism) to the gravest (such as arson or homicide), and the law has established mechanisms to deal with those eventualities. This entry examines the types of behaviors that constitute juvenile crime, as well as the characteristics of juveniles who are most frequently arrested for their unlawful actions, and concludes with a brief overview of possible explanations for juvenile crime. It is noteworthy that a significant proportion of these juveniles are individuals of color, and accordingly, criminologists continually strive to explore the relationship between race and formal processing by the justice system.

Defining Juvenile Crime

Generally, the definition of juvenile crime comprises three elements: age, behavior, and adjudication. In other words, to be described as a juvenile delinquent, an individual must be of a certain age, have behaved or acted in a way that has been designated as unlawful, and have been formally processed and given the label of a juvenile criminal or delinquent.

Age

Depending on the particular jurisdiction, the age criterion may vary. State statutes prescribe the upper and lower limits of the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, thereby signifying the age at which a juvenile can first be held legally culpable for his or her actions (the age of responsibility) as well as the age at which a juvenile is automatically excluded from juvenile court jurisdiction. Children younger than the age of responsibility are presumed to be incapable of forming mens tea (criminal intent) and consequently are ineligible to be prosecuted for their actions. Any individual who has attained the age of responsibility but who is younger than the age of majority as dictated by state statute may be regarded as a juvenile.

Conduct

The second element in juvenile crime pertains to the wrongfulness of the conduct involved; in other words, whether or not the action that has been committed constitutes a crime. The same behaviors that are considered unlawful or criminal if engaged in by adults are likewise regarded as unlawful or criminal if engaged in by juveniles. Additionally, juveniles are precluded from engaging in certain behaviors that are permissible if engaged in by adults, such as truancy, drinking, smoking, running away from home, having undesirable companions, and being disobedient to parents and teachers. These behaviors are called status offenses and are considered to serve as an early warning system of potential risk; a juvenile who drinks, smokes, skips school, and runs away from home is believed to demonstrate by his or her actions that something is amiss at home or at school and that, if left untreated, further problematic behavior may ensue. Action is believed to be warranted, then, in the juvenile's best interest as well as in the interest of public order and safety.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading