Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In his 1987 book Gringo Justice, Chicano sociologist, lawyer, and activist Alfredo Mirandé provided an alternative to mainstream explanations of Chicano criminality and its social control. His book, one of the most widely recognized works in the field of criminology and criminal justice, offers a sociohistorical explanation of the seemingly disparate treatment of Mexican-origin Latinos within the U.S. criminal justice system. The concept of gringo justice developed by Mirandé offers a perspective that is rooted in a Chicano worldview and responsive to the particularities of Chicano culture and history. Even so, labeling, conflict, and social constructionist perspectives inform this framework, which first appeared alongside the early developmental years of the scholarly legal movement now commonly referred to as critical race theory.

At the heart of the concept of gringo justice is an assertion that a dual standard of justice in the United States benefits Whites at the expense of Mexican Americans. Gringo justice points to the historical development and maintenance of a stereotypical image of Chicanos as inherently criminal, rather than looking toward internal shortcomings (biological, psychological, and/or cultural) of Mexicans to explain their criminal behavior and its societal regulation. It is the mobilization of this stereotype at suitable times by public and/or private actors that produces the conscious or unconscious disparate treatment of Chicanos at the hands of various criminal justice agents and legal authorities. This entry reviews the relationship between the United States and Mexico from the early 19th century to the present, highlighting the ways in which U.S. policy and socioeconomic interests contributed to the development of a stereotype of Chicano criminality.

The Development of Gringo Justice

To fully comprehend the negative manifestations of gringo justice, it is necessary to recognize and understand the legacy of social, economic, and political conflict between the United States and Mexico, which developed during the early 19th-century settlement of the northern Mexico borderlands now identified as the American Southwest. Ironically, Mexican authorities formally invited American immigration into their northern borderlands as early as 1822 to help stabilize the region, which basically was populated by a number of nomadic and warring indigenous tribes, despite over 200 years of Spanish and Mexican colonizing efforts. A trickle of legal immigrants recruited through empresarios, or land agents, soon turned into a tide of mostly southern, undocumented American immigrants who brought with them preconceived notions of Anglo superiority and dominance. Not surprising, these Anglo American immigrants in the northern borderlands came to view Mexicans as a subhuman and inferior mongrel race due to their centuries-old African, Indian, and European mestizaje, or racial/ethnic mixing.

This negative view of Mexicans coincided with national desires of American expansionism that congealed into the concept of Manifest Destiny. This belief became the rallying inspiration and justification for God's chosen people to settle the North American continent in order to spread freedom through democratic institutions among those who could be self-governed. Unfortunately, non-Whites, and to a lesser degree, non-Anglo Saxon Protestant Europeans were excluded from the category of those who could be self-governed. Mexicans, with their mixed racial and cultural background and adherence to feudal and Catholic traditions, were the antithesis to emergent American core values.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading