Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In an effort to explain high rates of crime and violence among African Americans, some criminologists have used the colonial model to analyze the effects of race and social class and their interactive effect on specific attitudes and behaviors.

The model has its foundations in the work of Frantz Fanon, who examined relations between majority and minority groups in colonial settings. According to this perspective, colonization occurs when one group forcibly takes over the country of another group. During this process, those who are colonized are then forced to adhere to the norms of the colonizer. As a result, the colonized are exposed to a different set of cultural standards that become the standard by which the native group will be measured. However, the colonized are then forced to exist within a colonial society with limited resources.

Scholars argue that Black crime can emerge as a result of the political and economic inequalities that propel many minorities into criminal lifestyles since their chances for equal justice under the law are minimized. From the perspective of the colonial model, racial disparities and inequality in the U.S. criminal justice system suggest that the colonizer (Whites) has targeted Blacks, resulting in higher arrest rates and lengthy prison sentences. Those who resist this colonial authority are seen as political prisoners. Robert Staples, who refers to the police as “internal military agents,” has also noted the critical role the police play in maintaining order within the colonial society.

Colonialism and the Death Penalty

Throughout the history of the American justice system, Blacks and minorities have been overrepresented in criminal cases and prison sentences, particularly in cases involving the death penalty. Scholars have used colonial theory to analyze racial disproportionality in the prison population and in the application of the death penalty. Recent governmental and state-sponsored reports have found that Blacks and other minority defendants are more likely than White defendants to receive the death penalty for the same crime. Specifically, evidence has shown higher execution rates for Black defendant/White victim crimes compared to those in which the defendant is White and the victim is Black. The role of race and racism remains controversial, and it continues to be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court and in other legal cases. According to some governmental reports, a majority of studies of racial discrimination in implementation of the death penalty show that the race of the victim correlates significantly with the death penalty (i.e., when a similar homicide under similar circumstances is committed by defendants with similar criminal histories, the defendant is several times more likely to receive the death penalty if the victim is White than if the victim is Black).

Several criminologists have noted that colonial theory is compatible with many conflict-theoretical analyses of American racism, emphasizing that Whites have systematically controlled and exploited racial minorities. Others have elaborated by pointing out that conflict theorists have tended either to ignore the role played by race in relation to criminal justice or to subordinate its significance to social class. As a result, these critics argue, conflict theorists have simply lumped all poor people together, regardless of their race/ethnicity, on that assumption that socioeconomic class is the major factor determining treatment in the criminal justice system. The evidence, however, remains consistent with the tenets of the colonial perspective.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading