Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Elder Abuse

Although elder abuse is a pervasive and growing problem, much about this topic remains unknown, and inconsistency in definitions has hampered research and practice. Both the lack of clarity of definition and the underreporting of cases have prevented a clear picture of prevalence. Notwithstanding, it is estimated that between 1 and 2 million Americans over age 65 have experienced some type of abuse. Elder abuse occurs in both institutional and domestic settings. Currently six types of abuse are generally agreed on. Profiles of victims have found no gender differences, but likelihood of abuse is higher in elders with low income and in those who are depressed or who have experienced earlier domestic abuse. Abusers are most often children and other family members of victims. Regarding treatment and prevention, collaborative approaches have been shown to be best suited for elder abuse victims; psychologists play an important role on these teams. Finally, additional funding has been noted as critical for improving prevention and treatment services, but equally important is the need for additional research.

Definitions and Prevalence

Early attempts to compile statistics on elder abuse suffered from a lack of consistency in definition. While there is still some disagreement among the various interested professional groups, a generally accepted definition of elder abuse now exists. Elder abuse is the umbrella term used to refer to any act that causes harm or risk of harm to a vulnerable adult. The acts can occur to elders living in domestic settings (private homes, apartments, etc.) and to elders in institutional or residential facilities. Regardless of site, six different types of abuse have been identified. For all types, acts are considered abuse whether they are intentional or not and whether they include verbal or nonverbal behavior. Physical abuse includes inflicting pain or injury or depriving a basic need. Sexual abuse includes nonconsensual sexual contact of any kind. Emotional or psychological abuse is the infliction of emotional anguish or distress. Financial or material exploitation involves funds, property, and assets. Neglect is the loss of food, shelter, health care, or protection and is the most common type in domestic settings. Self-neglect is any act by the elder himself or herself that threatens health or safety. Finally, abandonment is the desertion of an elder by anyone who has assumed responsibility for care.

An accurate picture of the incidence and prevalence of elder abuse is elusive for a number of reasons. First, not all states use the preceding definitions. Second, there are no uniform reporting standards or systems. This has prevented the collection of comprehensive national data. Third, only a portion of elder abuse cases is ever reported. Vulnerable elders are even less able or willing, and thus less likely, than are victims of other domestic abuse to report abuse or neglect. Current estimates suggest that only 1 out of every 5 cases in all settings is reported and only 1 in every 14 cases in domestic settings. Consequently, statistics suffer from underreporting. The National Center on Elder Abuse estimates that between 1 and 2 million Americans aged 65 and over, a frequency of 2% to 10%, have been injured, exploited, or otherwise mistreated. Specific studies indicated that in 1996, nearly 450,000 adults aged 65 and over were abused and/or neglected in domestic settings, and in 2003, the Long Term Care Ombudsmen programs reported 20,673 complaints from institutional residents. A survey of State Adult Protective Services (the agencies responsible for collecting and investigating reports of elder abuse) by the Administration on Aging, in 2004, found an increase of 19.7% in reports from 2000 to 2004 and an increase of 15.6% in substantiated cases. In considering these data, it should be remembered that the population of elders and of vulnerable elders is increasing. Furthermore, improvements in reporting and investigating may also underlie some of the increase in the number of cases reported and certainly in the substantiation of those cases. As evidence for this, states with mandatory reporting and tracking have higher rates of investigation.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading