Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Introduction

According to the relational, or transactional, stress concept favoured by most researchers in the field, stress is a process in which external or internal demands are interpreted by persons in relation to their own resources, values, and goals. Stress occurs if demands are appraised as taxing or exceeding the person's abilities or resources to cope with those demands. The most widely examined manifestations of stress are emotional and biological responses, particularly neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and immune responses. Furthermore, stress is expected to lead to attempts at coping with the situations perceived as stressful (Cohen, Kessler & Underwood Gordon, 1997; Herbert & Cohen, 1996; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).

Based on the relational stress concept, assessment of stress includes four main components: (1) environmental demands, usually termed stres-sors; (2) an individuaL's subjective evaluations of potentially stressful situations, or subjective appraisals; (3) stress-related emotional responses; and (4) biological stress responses. This entry focuses on approaches to measuring the psychosocial components of the stress process, including environmental demands, subjective evaluations of stress, and emotional stress responses. Comprehensive reviews of the measurement of biological stress responses are provided by Cohen, Kessler, and Underwood Gordon (1997).

Assessment of Environmental Demands

In measuring environmental demands, three types of stressful events are usually distinguished: major life events, minor life events, or daily hassles, and chronic stressors.

Major Life Events

The most influential approach to measuring life events was developed by Holmes, Rahe, and colleagues (Holmes & Rahe, 1967). In this approach, major life events are defined as events that require increased efforts to readjust to the changes they induce. The stress potential of life events is particularly seen in the cumulative amount of change brought about by successive events occurring within a relatively short period of time. Accordingly, life event measures usually assess the occurrence of life events over a specified time frame, mostly six months or one year, by means of checklists or interviews.

Checklist Measures

The earliest and most widely used checklist measure is the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS; Holmes & Rahe, 1967) that contains 43 events such as marriage or retirement. Each event is assigned a standardized weight—called ‘life change unit’—based on ratings of the degree of readjustment assumed to be required by the event. The sum of ‘life change units’ over a given period of time is assumed to represent the environmental stress that a person has experienced. Since the publication of the SRRS, a wide array of different life event inventories has been developed for children, adolescents, adults, and aged persons (Turner & Wheaton, 1997).

Though the checklist procedure is the dominant method for assessing life events, it has spawned serious critique (Herbert & Cohen, 1996; Thoits, 1983; Turner & Wheaton, 1997). One objection concerns the event list comprehensiveness. Checklists have been criticized for omitting certain types of events, in particular socially sensitive events, ‘non-events’ such as not having children, and events that are common in certain socio-economic and ethnic groups. Given that the social construction of what constitutes a life event varies with sociocultural groups, it is recommended that in addition to including universally important events, event lists should be representative for the particular sociocultural setting under scrutiny.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading