Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Introduction

‘Clinical judgement’ refers generally to the result of a set of cognitive activities that aim to: (a) classify an observed behavioural pattern into a nosological system category (diagnostic judgement); (b) predict the development of an observed behavioural pattern under a given treatment, or under particular environmental conditions (predictive judgement, or prognosis); (c) estimate the degree of severity of a disorder (severity judgement); and (d) make an informed decision about the best treatment (treatment judgement).

Many published works describe how diagnostic and prognostic judgements are made. Some propose theoretical models to represent diagnostic and prognostic judgements, but little has been published about severity- and treatment-judgements.

A clinical judgement is the result of three main complex activities: data collection, data evaluation, and information integration. Because these activities are sequential, clinical-judgement making is often considered a process and, in this case, each activity might be considered a process stage. Usually, at the conclusion of the last stage, the judgement is communicated externally as a formal ‘clinical report’ or ‘diagnostic report’.

Many psychological models of judgement-making only focus on one or two stages of the internal cognitive process, not all three, and none includes the clinical report stage.

Psychological Study of Clinical Judgement

The empirical study of clinical judgement was stimulated by the so called clinical-statistical controversy (see entry Prediction: Clinical vs. Statistical). From the beginning these studies revealed that statistical predictions are more accurate than the intuitive predictions of clinicians, and two research strategies evolved. One describes professional judgements empirically and develops theoretical models to improve clinical training and judgement performance. The other aims to develop expert systems and computerized support systems to help clinicians to solve clinical problems. Computerized strategies helped develop artificial intelligence that, although closely associated with cognitive psychology, lies beyond the scope of this entry.

Lineal Models

Early and important methods for the study of clinical judgement were the lens and the policy-capturing models.

Hoffman's policy-capturing research strategy (1960) uses regression equations to simulate clinical-judgement making. It aims to discover the subjective relative importance the clinician gives to the several data elements used to make the final judgement. In regression equations the relative importance of the same data elements is expressed objectively by ‘regression weights’. In addition, the researchers in this type of study take into account the different strategies the clinicians use when they integrate this information to make their judgement. Several important conclusions have emerged from policy-capturing research:

  • clinicians generally use only a few cues to make a clinical judgement;
  • the subjective importance that clinicians give to their data often does not agree with the regression weights of the same data;
  • the disparities between objective and subjective ‘weights’ suggests that most clinicians are unaware of the subjective importance they attribute to their data;
  • although lineal regression equations often represent and predict very well how clinicians make clinical judgements, most clinicians believe that they use configurational and non-lineal reasoning;
  • configurational modelling of clinical judgement (by using: analysis of variance; interaction-effects in the regression equations; or one of several other analytical procedures) does not depict or predict clinicians' judgements better than lineal modelling;
  • configurational modelling does not improve judgement accuracy. Nevertheless, the configurational-reasoning idea strongly influenced clinical judgement studies and contributed to the development of Anderson's information-integration theory (Anderson, 1981).

The lens model is based on original work by Brunswik. Hammond (1955) adapted it for use in the field of clinical judgement. This theoretical approach proved highly effective to depict the relationships between intuitive judgement and an objective criterion. The lens model also

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading