Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Introduction

The first assessment of individual differences is reported in the Bible in the Book of Judges, Chapter 7 on Gideon. God asked Gideon, who was battling the Midianites, to thin out his troops by rejecting individuals who were both fearful and afraid of battle. However, too many men were left, so God instructed Gideon to lead his men down to the water and used the following selection procedure. Out of 10,000 persons, 300 lapped with water from their hands, with their tongues. They were selected. The ones who knelt to drink were not.

This entry will focus on the assessment of anxiety as an individual differences variable; the dimensional conceptualization of anxiety. Dimensionality arises from a personality psychology tradition, in which traits and behaviours are measured psychometrically. Traits are viewed as existing on a continuum, with low levels of a trait (e.g. anxiety) at one end and high levels of the trait at the opposite end of the same continuum. In contrast to the dimensional approach is the typological or categorical conceptualization of anxiety, consistent with the medical model (Endler & Kocovski, 2001). Another entry in this encyclopedia covers the assessment of anxiety disorders.

Definition of Anxiety

Anxiety has been conceptualized as a stimulus, as a trait, as a motive, and as a drive and has been defined ‘as an emotional state, with the subjectively experienced quality of fear as a closely related emotion’ (Lewis, 1970: 77). Lewis notes that the emotion is unpleasant, future-oriented, disproportional to the threat and includes both subjective and manifest bodily disturbances. There are physiological, cognitive, and behavioural components to anxiety. These give rise to the various methods of the assessment of anxiety. It is important to first distinguish between state anxiety and trait anxiety.

State vs. Trait Anxiety

State anxiety is the momentary experience of anxiety. Trait anxiety is a predisposition or proneness to be anxious. The distinction between state and trait anxiety was first suggested by Cicero (Before the Common Era). Spielberger (1983) suggested that conceptual clarity could be achieved in the anxiety literature by distinguishing between state and trait anxiety. There are various methods to assess state anxiety. The assessment of trait anxiety has been conducted primarily through the use of self-report measures.

Multidimensionality of State and Trait Anxiety

Trait anxiety and state anxiety are both multidimensional constructs (Endler, 1997; Endler, Edwards & Vitelli, 1991). There are at least six facets of trait anxiety: social evaluation, physical danger, ambiguous, self-disclosure, separation and daily routines; and two facets of state anxiety: cognitive-worry and autonomic emotional (Endler & Flett, 2001). These facets of state and trait anxiety are presented in Table 1.

Interaction Model of Anxiety

The distinction between state and trait anxiety has achieved wide recognition in the interaction model of anxiety, a subset of the interaction model of personality (Endler, 1997). According to the interaction model, increases in state anxiety will result only when a situational stressor is congruent with the facet of trait anxiety under investigation. Over 80% of the tests of the multidimensional interaction model of anxiety have yielded support for the model (Endler, 1997).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading