Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The cognitive revolution in psychology moved the field from simply observing the relationship between environmental stimuli and behavior to attempting to understand how people mentally represent both the environment and their behavior within it. At first, these representations were seen as located within individual brains. Consequently, cognition was seen as an individual phenomenon. The cognitive revolution was seen as one reason for the decline of research on group-level phenomena during the 1960s and 1970s. However, more recent conceptualizations of the role of cognitive processes in social behavior have led to a resurgence in group research. One of the most influential concepts underlying this resurgence is the notion of socially shared cognitions.

The idea that cognition is a social phenomenon is not new. Early theorists such as George Herbert Mead and Lev Vygotsky argued that the way people view and interpret the world is influenced by their social environment. Unfortunately, this idea was slow to be integrated into mainstream cognitive and social psychology. Early cognitive theories of language and person perception focused on how information (e.g., words, perceptions of others) was represented in an individual's mental structure. However, research began to show that the same word or stimulus was represented very differently when presented in different contexts. In addition, research found that the meaning attributed to particular messages differed when they came from different social groups. Finally, research on how speakers interpreted messages they gave (or were about to give) showed that interpretations changed as a function of the group to which the message was given and even just as a function of presenting the message. Thus, both what we think and how we think change as a function of the social and cultural context within which such thinking occurs. In general, the social context leads people within that context to believe similar things and think about the world in similar ways, which is the basic definition of socially shared cognition.

How Shared Cognitions Develop

There are a number of different ways in which cognitions become shared among a particular social or cultural group. First, evolution has played a major role in shaping how cognitions are shared and in what ways. For example, evolved tendencies toward affiliation (e.g., need to belong) ensure healthy amounts of social contact, which is necessary for shared cognitions to develop. The brain structures designed for language interpretation and production are also central to the processes involved in shared cognitions. Common experience is also important for shared cognitions. People who share a particular location experience the same environment and learn to adapt to that environment in similar ways. Recent dynamic models of social influence have shown that simply living in the same geographic location leads to belief convergence among people.

However, most shared cognitions are probably developed through social perception and interaction. Virtually all cultures and societies have in place mechanisms for teaching their young the shared “truths” as defined by the culture or society. Schools, churches, libraries, museums, and so forth all serve as vehicles for socialization, helping ensure that knowledge and values considered valid or appropriate are shared among the members of a society or culture. In addition to these formal mechanisms, simply observing the behavior of others and interacting with them will lead to shared cognitions. Social comparison is another major influence on people's behavior, particularly in new or uncertain situations. People use social comparison both to detect appropriate behavior and opinions and to validate the correctness of their own behavior and opinions. Norms for appropriate behavior in a particular situation are learned quickly, even if those norms conflict with more accepted or prescribed rules for behavior. For example, even though littering is considered inappropriate behavior (a prescriptive norm), research has shown that people are much more likely to litter after being reminded of the prescriptive norm (do not litter) in settings where others have obviously littered (a descriptive norm).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading