Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

When people interact in groups or think of the way their group relates to other groups, they do not always think of themselves as separate individuals (I am John). Instead, they may think of themselves and act as group members (I am an environmentalist). In psychology, a distinction is therefore made between people's personal identities (referring to their individual self) and their social identities (indicating the group self). Social identity theory, which was originally developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s, focuses on the interplay between personal and social identities. Its aim is to specify and predict the circumstances under which individuals tend to think of themselves either as individuals or as group members. The theory also considers the consequences of personal and social identities for individual perceptions and group behavior.

Over the years, many researchers and theorists have found this a useful analytical framework. A large body of research has accumulated to specify the basic processes involved, which has led to several refinements and extensions of social identity theory over the years. The theory has also been applied to analyze and understand a range of societal problems (most notably in the area of stereotyping and intergroup conflict) and a variety of topics in organizational behavior (such as leadership, team motivation, and organizational commitment). This entry looks at the background of this concept and then discusses several key elements of the theory and some common misunderstandings about what it says.

Background and History

Social identity theory developed out of a series of studies conducted by Tajfel and his colleagues in the early 1970s, which are commonly referred to as the minimal group studies. These were designed to identify the minimal conditions that would lead individuals to discriminate in favor of the ingroup, to which they belonged, and against an outgroup. For this purpose, participants were assigned to groups that were intended to be as empty and meaningless as possible. Nevertheless, when people were asked to assign points to other research participants, they systematically awarded more points to ingroup members than to outgroup members. In doing this, they maximized the relative gain for ingroup compared with outgroup members, even when this implied awarding a lower number of points to the ingroup. The results of these minimal group studies were interpreted by arguing that the mere act of categorizing individuals into groups can be sufficient to make them think of themselves and others in terms of group memberships instead of as separate individuals. This deviated from common views at the time, namely, that an objective conflict of interest is a central factor in the emergence of intergroup conflict.

Thus, social identity theory originated from the conviction that group memberships can help people instill meaning in social situations. Group memberships help people define who they are and how they relate to others. Social identity theory was developed as an integrative theory, as it aimed to connect cognitive (thought) processes and (behavioral) motivation. Initially, its main focus was on intergroup conflict and intergroup relations more broadly. For this reason, the original form has been referred to as the social identity theory of intergroup relations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading