Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Social compensation is superior effort exerted when an individual works on a collective task as compared with working individually or coactively. Collective tasks involve combining all group members' contributions, which means that members are evaluated together. Coactive tasks involve individuals working in the presence of others but not combining their contributions, which means that evaluations can be made individually. Social compensation involves working hard to make up for other group members whose performances are expected to be inferior.

For example, a group of product executives might be asked to generate as many uses as they can for a new product. If someone believes that other group members are not capable of or willing to perform well at this task, and the outcome of this collective task is important, then that person will work especially hard to generate more uses for the product in order to make up for the possibility that other group members will not generate many uses. If someone is working alone, then he or she will not be concerned with a group's overall outcome and will not try to make up for others' lack of effort. If someone believes that others can or will work hard, then the typical response is social loafing (putting less effort into a collective task than if one were working alone or coactively). This entry looks at the phenomenon of social compensation, related research, and practical implications.

Background

Tasks are often completed in groups, such as committees, sports teams, juries, marching bands, and quality control teams. Numerous tasks are completed collectively, in that an individual's contributions are pooled with the contributions of coworkers to form a single outcome, such as a decision, a score (in a sports game), a musical performance, or an inspected product. Some of the earliest social-psychological research investigated how groups work together to complete a task. Social psychologists were particularly interested in how working in groups affects the motivation, effort, and productivity of individuals.

In early research on this topic, Max Ringelmann wanted to understand why, when he added a second ox to a team pulling a plow, the plowing did not get done twice as fast. Ringelmann explored this issue by studying the performance of men pulling on a rope. He found there was a loss of motivation when the men collectively pulled on the rope, compared with when they pulled as hard as they could individually. He speculated that this reduction of individual effort on a collective task was merely an artifact of coordination problems and was not psychological in nature.

However, researchers in the 1970s found that when lack of coordination was ruled out, social loafing remained a robust psychological phenomenon. Social loafing occurs when individuals expend less effort collectively, when the outcome is dependent on how everyone performs, than they do coactively, when individuals work by themselves but in the presence of others. Social loafing can be reduced or eliminated through several means, such as increasing the identifiability or evaluability of the individual members' contributions, enhancing personal involvement with the task, elevating the uniqueness of individual contributions, or strengthening group cohesiveness.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading