Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Realistic group conflict theory (RGCT) states that competition between groups for finite resources leads to intergroup stereotypes, antagonism, and conflict. Such competition creates incompatible goals for members of different groups because one group's success in obtaining those resources prevents the other group from obtaining them. Such conflicts of interest lead to the development of ingroup norms that foster negative reactions to the outgroup, backed by punishment and rejection of those ingroup members who deviate from those norms.

Just as RGCT argues that competition for desired but limited resources creates intergroup conflict, it also argues that cooperation in pursuit of superordinate goals, mutually desired outcomes that are unobtainable without such cooperation, has the potential over time to reduce intergroup conflict and to create positive relations among members of cooperating groups. This entry describes the background of RGCT, examines major research findings, and discusses the theory's importance.

Background, History, and Major Research Findings

RGCT was given its name by anthropologist Robert LeVine and psychologist Donald Campbell, who formulated and cross-culturally tested propositions based on existing psychological, sociological, and anthropological research on ethnocentrism and group conflict. In the course of this work, they grouped theories explaining ethnocentrism into several categories (reference group theory, frustration aggressiondisplacement theory, etc.), including one they dubbed realistic group conflict theory. They used this term to refer to “the set of all theories that generate the ethnocentrism syndrome from the competitive struggle of groups with incompatible interests” (LeVine & Campbell, 1972, p. 72).

As indicated above, the core idea in RGCT is that intergroup stereotyping, prejudice, and hostility emerge when groups have conflicting interests, and specifically when one group's success blocks the other's goal attainment. RGCT includes a large number of specific predictions about the way in which clashing interests between groups influence both ingroup functioning and intergroup relations. For example, RGCT predicts that conflict with outgroups enhances ingroup solidarity. It also predicts that the more another group stands in the way of one's own group's attainment of desired goals, the greater the hostility created toward that other group. Some of these propositions have stimulated much more research than others.

Robbers Cave

The research most commonly cited in discussions of RGCT is a series of three studies by Muzafer Sherif and colleagues conducted between 1949 and 1954, in which boys of 11 to 12 years of age attended summer camps that were set up to study intergroup behavior, although the boys were not aware of this fact. The third and most famous of these studies was the Robbers Cave experiment. The goal of the first phase of this study was to have two sets of previously unacquainted boys each coalesce into a group, with differentiated status positions, group norms, and the like. To achieve this end, campers were divided into two groups, each of which engaged with ingroup members in a series of enjoyable activities (preparing food at a “hideout,” deciding how to spend money the group had won, etc.).

During the next week, in the experiment's second phase, when the campers in the different groups interacted for the first time, the situation was structured so that the two groups had incompatible interests. Specifically, the groups were brought into initial contact in a series of competitive activities (baseball games, a treasure hunt, etc.), during which each accumulated points toward valued prizes to be given to the group with the highest cumulative score.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading