Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Homophily is the tendency for there to be higher rates of contact between similar people than between dissimilar people. It is the social process reflected in that old bit of folk wisdom: “Birds of a feather flock together.” Homophily is crucial to the study of group processes because it conditions every interaction. It affects who people interact with, how interactions are structured, the process of group formation, and the course of interactions between groups. This entry describes the basic types of homophily, their origins, and their social implications.

The observation that “like attracts like” is by no means a recent pronouncement. It was Plato who stated that “similarity begets friendship” and Aristotle who noted that some people like those who are like themselves. Stated another way, homophily means that similarity breeds connection. Similarity in the case of homophily refers to ascribed characteristics, such as gender, race, and age, and achieved characteristics, such as education, social class, and occupation. In essence, homophily organizes society. Because individuals are more likely to interact with those similar to themselves, traits are concentrated in groups.

At this point it is useful to distinguish between homogeneity and homophily. Homogeneity is a descriptive term that refers to the degree of similarity within a group or relationship. Thus homogeneity is a way to characterize similarity in groups, while homophily describes the mechanism that leads to homogeneity. In other words, groups become homogeneous due to homophily.

Types of Homophily

Some of the tendency to associate with similar others is a by-product of our more limited opportunities to interact with people who are different from ourselves. This type of homophily is called induced homophily. Induced homophily refers to the tendency for interaction partners to be limited by social structure in ways that generate homogeneous groups and relations. Induced homophily stands in contrast to choice homophily, which refers to the tendency of people to choose interaction partners who are similar to themselves.

In naturally occurring groups and relationships, it often is difficult to know how much observed homogeneity occurs as a result of induced homophily and how much results from choice homophily. So, in empirical contexts, researchers often begin by taking account of baseline homophily. We can think of baseline homophily as the amount of similarity within relationships that would be expected by chance, given the choices available. For example, taking into account population information only, we would not expect any baseline homophily based on sex, since sex is an equally distributed characteristic. Baseline expectations would be that an individual would have 50% male friends and 50% female friends. Therefore, if 90% of a woman's friends are female, it indicates that something other than chance is guiding formation of her friendships. That “something” is called inbreeding homophily. Inbreeding homophily refers to any amount of homophily over and above what probability would predict based on the relative sizes of the groups in the population. In the example above, we would interpret the difference between the expected and observed rates of similarity (40%) as evidence of inbreeding homophily.

Baseline homophily reflects induced homophily. It tells us about the most basic, populationlevel constraints on our choices of interaction partners. It is more difficult to isolate choice homophily. Inbreeding homophily can reflect choice homophily, or ingroup preferences. However, inbreeding homophily can also be induced by social structures.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading