Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Evolutionary psychology (EP) is a specific theoretical framework within the evolutionary sciences. The EP perspective toward understanding human functioning and behavior has several unique features and cardinal assumptions that make it different from other major perspectives in the evolutionary sciences such as behavioral ecology and co-evolution. Scholars who adopt an EP perspective, for example, assume that the human mind has been shaped by tens of thousands of years of rather focused selection pressures. Over time, these selection pressures have generated domain-specific cognitive algorithms (i.e., cognitive, emotional, or behavioral responses that reliably occur in response to a specific environmental stimulus or set of stimuli). These mechanisms, on average, helped our ancestors make adaptive choices, judgments, and decisions that in turn promoted their survival and reproduction (i.e., their reproductive fitness).

According to the EP perspective, therefore, our minds are a reflection of the most important selection pressures that our ancestors encountered during evolutionary history and, consequently, our “stone age” minds are sometimes ill equipped to deal with novel features and contingencies of the modern world effectively. This explains why most people are morbidly afraid of snakes and heights (which were recurrent, major threats to the reproductive fitness of people throughout evolutionary history), but they are not afraid of cars or electrical outlets, which kill many more people each year than do snake bites or falls. It also explains why people have such difficulty limiting their intake of salty, fatty, and sugary foods, which are overly abundant in many parts of the world today but were scarce and valuable sources of needed calories during our evolutionary past.

This entry provides an overview of evolutionary psychology, examining its basic assumptions and its view of intragroup and intergroup processes.

Basic Assumptions

One of the most controversial assumptions of the EP perspective is that, because there were so many strong and recurrent selection pressures throughout evolutionary history, the human mind contains a host of highly domain-specific cognitive algorithms. Once they had been selected and could be passed on genetically to offspring, these algorithms permitted our ancestors to make rapid, efficient, reliable, and usually fitness-enhancing decisions when confronted with issues and situations that were most relevant to survival and reproduction across evolutionary history. According to the EP approach, the evolution of these genetically based algorithms accounts for much of the cross-cultural consistency that is witnessed in many psychological features, ranging from which features of mates tend to be most attractive cross-culturally to which types of objects or social situations most people in vastly different cultures universally like, dislike, fear, become addicted to, or dread. This cardinal assumption—that the human mind is comprised of many domain-specific cognitive algorithms, shaped by past selection pressures, which helped our ancestors “solve” recurrent problems related to their reproductive fitness with economy, efficiency, and reliability—remains one of the most contentious aspects of the EP framework.

In addition to knowing what the cardinal assumptions of EP are, it is equally important to understand what the EP perspective does not suggest. It does not suggest that the environment and what people learn within their cultures or groups is unimportant. In fact, virtually all EP-based models assume that one cannot understand the operation of evolved mental algorithms without also knowing to which kinds of environmental stimuli, events, or learning histories an individual has been exposed. EP also does not presume that natural selection reflects what is “right” or “proper” (that is, it does not fall prey to the naturalistic fallacy), nor does it imply that naturally selected genes that underlie specific mental algorithms invariably “determine” how people think, feel, and behave in different social situations. Genes cannot express themselves in phenotypes unless they are triggered by and unfold within the context of specific environments.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading