Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The dynamical systems approach views groups as systems in which collective behavior arises from the flow of information and mutual influence among members. This approach to studying groups uses concepts and methods from systems, chaos, catastrophe, and complexity theories. A dynamic system (a general term) is any system that changes over time. A dynamical system (a more technical term) is any system whose current state provides a basis for predicting its state in the immediate future. The dynamical systems approach is particularly useful for understanding how groups change over time, whether that means short time spans of minutes and hours or longer periods of weeks, months, and years. Change includes small fluctuations, rhythmic cycles, and both abrupt and gradual departures from prior patterns.

Scholars who take a dynamical systems approach share an interest in the interplay between stability and instability that underlies continuity and change in groups. This approach has been most commonly applied to collective behavior, from dyads to small groups to crowds and organizations. However, it has also generated theory and research on the patterning of attitudes in groups, on therapeutic outcomes in group members, and on the emotional dynamics of group members. Studies using this approach have demonstrated how the emergence of stable dissenting subgroups is consistent with conformity theories, shown that greater complexity heightens the effectiveness of group therapy, and explained why a modest intervention can have either a small or a dramatically large effect on the accident rates among workers in groups.

History of Dynamical Systems Approaches to Groups

Most contemporary dynamical systems approaches to modeling groups were developed in the 1980s and 1990s, but precursors were evident decades earlier. Kurt Lewin, one of the founders of group dynamics, proposed an explicitly dynamic approach to studying groups in the 1940s. Application of his field theory approach, however, was hampered by the lack of appropriate methods. In the same era, Robert F. Bales (who was influenced by Lewin) developed one of the earliest methods to measure group interaction, using a finegrained scale that classified every statement in a group discussion. A statement might be a request for information, for example, or an expression of approval or support. The resulting time series of codes can be examined to detect recurring patterns over time.

A new wave of dynamical systems approaches to groups emerged in the 1980s. A few years earlier, in 1976, mathematician E. C. Zeeman published a catastrophe model designed to predict the sudden outbreak of prison riots based on a combination of tension and alienation. Catastrophe models are a set of mathematical models of discontinuous change such as explosions or the sudden collapse of a bridge. However, the adoption of such analytical techniques by psychologists was not evident until a decade later, after further groundwork adapting catastrophe models to data in the biological and social sciences occurred. The repertoire of dynamical systems applications to psychology was further developed during the rest of the 20th century by applying and adapting methods and concepts from chaos theory and complexity theory. Chaos theory revealed that seemingly small events can have a profound impact on how a dynamic system such as a group changes over time. The complexity theory concept of self-organization—the spontaneous emergence of new structure and order—provided insight into group formation and the emergence of roles, norms, and routines in member behavior.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading