Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Prisons are places of great power inequalities. Rarely, however, does order have to be maintained within them through the overt use of force or weaponry. Though riots and other forms of violence do occur with some regularity in U.S. prisons, for the most part, everyday life goes on without such dramatic events; most prisoners follow most rules, most of the time.

In recent years, criminologists have explained this paradox that despite being held against their will, the majority of prisoners voluntarily submit to the rules or commands of prison officials, through the idea of legitimacy. According to these scholars, all institutions, including prisons, are best at regulating behavior when participants believe in their rules and accept their legitimacy. Prisoners must, in other words, believe that the commands, rules, and supervision of the prison staff are, overall, morally sound and fairly implemented. From this perspective, legitimacy operates as an important but subtle form of power that maintains a consensus between superiors and subordinates.

Nonetheless, scholars recognize that prison administrators and correctional staff face an uphill battle at building legitimacy. By design, correctional institutions are coercive environments in which a wide power disparity separates captors from captives. As a result, some wonder whether it is really possible to build legitimate authority when holding individuals against their will. In this view, prisoner compliance is based primarily on submission to force rather than legitimate authority. Prisons reduce disorder best by investing in surveillance mechanisms, limiting prisoners' individual due process rights, and reducing situational opportunities to engage in misconduct. This entry explores both sides of this debate about how order is maintained in prison.

Building Legitimate Authority

The overall number of prisoners, particularly when compared to officers, makes it difficult to maintain order based solely on a Hobbesian model of surveillance and force. There are simply too many prisoners in any facility to control them all through coercion and physical control alone. Thus, staff must somehow persuade inmates to want to follow the rules on their own free will. To do this, prison administrators and other correctional staff attempt to enforce discipline and order in such a way that (1) the rules can be defended through political and moral arguments, (2) administrator and staff authority is exerted consistently and fairly based on a set principles, and (3) administrators and staff recognize prisoners' citizenship and humanity.

In large part, views about legitimacy rest on beliefs about the causes of disorder within prisons. If disorder is assumed to result from a few antisocial individuals who cause trouble and lead others into noncompliant behavior, then a security model that limits prisoners' movements and ability to congregate logically follows. But if disorder is understood instead to be a group phenomenon—as the result of widespread perceived injustice—then attempts to build legitimacy would be the more reasonable response.

In Prisons and the Problem of Order, criminologists Richard Sparks, Anthony Bottoms, and Will Hay (1996) tested the assumption that legitimate authority was more efficient at securing order than force and sanctions by comparing the regimes of two English prisons. One institution relied on a situational crime prevention model, in which prisoners' movements were rigidly restricted (termed here a security model). The other attempted to limit noncompliance by allowing prisoners greater mobility and autonomy (legitimacy model). While there were greater rates of minor noncompliance in the prison operating according to a legitimacy model, there also were fewer major disturbances. The researchers conclude that recognizing the need to improve social conditions helped build legitimate authority and thereby maintained order more efficiently than a security-only model.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading