Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Juvenile detention centers detain young offenders sentenced by a juvenile court as well as those awaiting trial. In principle, juvenile detention center sentences are reserved for the most dangerous offenders from whom society needs protection or for those who are most likely to escape before their case ever reaches the court. Nevertheless, judges often sentence youths who have merely breached probation orders or are in noncompliance with a court order. Most detention centers house an overrepresentation of ethnic minorities and are ill equipped to meet the unique needs of female young offenders.

Detention centers are the most durable feature of the juvenile justice system. Even before the creation of juvenile courts, institutions to detain young people such as houses of refuge, industrial schools, and reformatories were present. When separate centers of detention for juvenile offenders were inaugurated at the beginning of the 19th century, child savers and justice officials alike were confident that these carceral institutions were the antidote to juvenile deviance.

In 1998, there were 1,121 public and 2,310 private juvenile detention centers in the United States. These facilities admit approximately half a million juvenile offenders every year with the majority residing in public facilities. Between 1985 and 1995, the average daily population in American detention centers increased by 72% and the expense of detaining young offenders more than doubled to reach $820 million in operating costs. Despite increasing costs and greater attention devoted to alternatives to custody, detention continues to be a popular solution to juvenile deviance among justice officials, the public, and politicians.

History

For much of the 18th and 19th centuries, the majority of the American population lived in rural areas where communities were closely knit and citizens’ lives were well integrated. The solidarity experienced in colonial America meant that criminal courts were unnecessary as justice was meted out by community members and was primarily directed not toward social exclusion (as is practiced today) but rather toward reintegration of the delinquent person into the community.

The primary mechanism to govern young offenders at this time was an informal network made up of church discipline, the family, and a strong network of community members. With the emergence of cities in the late 18th and early 19th centuries and the relative anonymity of the burgeoning urban context, informal social controls came to be less effective in dealing with juvenile misconduct. The influx of Western European immigrants and rural Americans migrating to cities in search of employment in the manufacturing sector created both a juvenile delinquent problem and a movement for its control.

To reclaim deviant youths, 19th-century reformers proposed centers of detention such as reformatories and industrial schools. Some institutions offered deviant boys disciplinary programs that emphasized education, athletics, drill, training in the habits of industry, and religious guidance designed to remake deviant them into respectable members of the working class who could fulfill their breadwinner roles, respect authority, attend church, and demonstrate self-control. Other institutions provided a disciplinary program designed to (re)make deviant girls into good, working-class women by training them in the values and manners of domesticity, femininity, and maternalism. Institutional officials encouraged girls to resist sexual temptations and attempted to make them into wives or chaste girls who could fill domestic roles in affluent homes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading