Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The practice of contracting with private agencies for correctional services grew substantially in the late 20th century, coinciding with a steady growth in the size of the correctional population. Contract facilities have become increasingly common in English-speaking countries, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Also referred to as partial privatization or outsourcing, the practice has faded in, out, and back into popularity over the course of history. Under a contract system, correctional services are funded by the government agency responsible for custody of inmates but delivered by a third party. The government maintains control over the type and quality of services provided but delegates the service delivery to a private entity. Contracts are typically arranged with nonprofit agencies, for-profit companies, or other government units.

While the contracting out of particular services such as medical care, food service, maintenance, education, and mental health services is widespread in corrections, the contracting out of entire correctional facilities is limited and has remained a controversial practice, particularly when for-profit companies are involved. Concerns that private companies may sacrifice conditions of confinement in order to make money and general ethical concerns about the delegation of punishment underlie an ongoing debate over contract facilities. In practice, the respective advantages and disadvantages of using contract facilities tend to vary considerably depending on the individual ability of contractors, the capacity of governments to oversee contracts, and the extent of provisions covered under the contracted agreement.

History

Government contracting with the private sector in the United States dates as far back as 1785 when the nascent federal government contracted with private stagecoach operators to deliver mail and passed subsequent legislation that required the bidding process to be publicly advertised. The U.S. experience with contracting for prisons and correctional facilities dates to the early 19th century. Borrowing from European workhouse models, the earliest American prisons (such as Philadelphia's Walnut Street Jail) contracted out the labor of convicts to private entrepreneurs. While the practice extended well into the 20th century, it became increasingly controversial due to abusive treatment of inmates, insider contracting arrangements, and concerns that prison labor was unfairly depressing wages and cutting into the private sector job market. By 1940, federal and state laws severely restricted the market for prison-made goods.

In the juvenile justice field, contract facilities have been providing services to juvenile delinquents since the early 20th century. Unlike the adult contract system, contracts for juvenile facilities have been primarily with religious, charitable, and other nonprofit agencies rather than for-profit businesses. As a result, the practice of placing juvenile delinquents in privately run facilities has proceeded with far less controversy than has been the case in the adult corrections arena. In the 1970s, the movement to deinstitutionalize status offenders from the youth correctional system created a demand for more contracted services and spawned considerable research on the effectiveness of contract facilities. As adult correctional populations increased during this time, at least 18 states passed “community corrections acts” designed to transfer resources and funding from state departments of correction to local governments and to provide community residential services to offenders. Many jurisdictions turned to private contractors to operate these facilities.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading