Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Bases of Power

The ability to get others to do one's will is known as social power. Social power consists of the available tools one person has to exert influence over another. It is the potential resources (which may or may not be used) that one has at one's command that can lead to an actual change (or deliberate maintenance) in the beliefs, attitudes, behavior, emotions, and so on in another person. Much of human interaction involves attempts to change or maintain beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in another, so this topic has long been of interest to social psychologists. Because of this, there have been a number of investigations using different definitions of social power, and investigations using different ways of measuring power. However, the approach most commonly used in the social psychological and industrial/organizational literature was proposed by John R. P. French Jr. and Bertram H. Raven in the 1950s. French and Raven identified specific social resources that people might possess that they could use to influence others; French and Raven called these resources the bases of power: informational, reward, coercion, legitimacy, expertise, and referent. Based on an early paper, some researchers omit informational, which was later listed as a base of power.

With additional research, there has been continual development of the bases of power. Now the bases of power include the original six resources as a broad framework, but some of these resources have been further differentiated.

Origins of the Bases of Power

The bases of power concept was developed at the Research Center for Group Dynamics at the University of Michigan in the early 1950s. Raven was a graduate student there working closely with Leon Festinger, who was Raven's PhD dissertation advisor at the time. During this period, Festinger wrote an article concerning some of the reasons people agree to do things. In the article, he observed that when offered a reward or threatened with punishment, people will often change their behavior, but only when those trying to influence them can observe them—when not being observed, the requested behavior stops. However, Festinger also found that sometimes the new behavior continued whether or not someone was being observed. In this case, it appeared that personal beliefs as well as behavior had changed.

Raven's dissertation (completed with French as his advisor when Festinger left for the University of Minnesota) was, in part, based on factors that distinguished behavior change requiring continued observation from change that did not. After Festinger left Michigan, Raven and French began to look at additional factors that affected changes in personal beliefs from those that only affected observable behavior. With the leadership of Dorwin Cartwright, at this point most of the members of the Research Center for Group Dynamics began to study social power.

As members of the group, French and Raven continued their investigations into social power. Because of French's extensive background in industrial and organizational psychology, they concentrated on the relationship between supervisors and subordinates in a work environment. Using the work environment as a guide while examining both the experimental literature and their own experiences, they developed the bases of power model.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading