Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

STATES' RIGHTS HAVE been an important element of the American federal political system. While major areas of policymaking responsibility, such as the treaty power and the power to coin money, have been delegated to the federal government, others arguably have been reserved to the states. When the federal government has attempted to legislate in reserved areas, states have at various times raised claims to their rights in order to negate the federal initiative, with various degrees of success.

The idea of states' rights resulted naturally from the multiplicity of societies that participated in the American Revolution. In addition, many of the grievances against the British government that drove the American colonists to rebellion centered on British rejection of the Americans' understanding concerning their colonial assemblies' (soon to be their states') rights. Most famously, the Americans insisted that only their local assemblies could tax them, but they also complained that the royal government had dissolved the New York assembly, reorganized the Massachusetts assembly, refused to approve bills passed by the Virginia assembly, and in many other ways denied American colonists the self-government to which they believed themselves entitled. Although the Imperial Crisis of the 1760s and 1770s imbued a sense of shared dangers and common interests in the leaders of the American Revolution, it was to 13 separate colonial-cum-state governments that they looked for a substitute for discredited royal authority. While coordinating American efforts in the War for Independence, members of Congress also persisted in seeking the interests of their own respective states in lieu of the common good where feasible.

The most significant conflict over states' rights during the American Revolution arose over the question of the original 13 states' western land claims. While some states, such as Rhode Island, Delaware, and Maryland, were confined to small areas on the Atlantic Coast, others (particularly Virginia) pointed to their charters in claiming extensive western lands. (Virginia's claims, for example, extended all the way northwest to what is now Wisconsin.)

Articles of Confederation

These claims led to serious dissension within the revolutionary congresses. When the Articles of Confederation were sent to the states for ratification by the Second Continental Congress, for example, Maryland announced that it would not ratify the Articles until Virginia surrendered its trans-Ohio River land claims.

In the interim, delegations from other states periodically raised questions concerning governance of the western lands and adjudication of Virginia's western claims. Virginia congressmen, led by George Mason, James Madison, and James Monroe, responded by enunciating a doctrine of states' rights and reserved powers: Congress, they said, had been delegated no power to adjudicate Virginia's claims, so they would not even discuss the matter in Congress. Vindicating its land claims was their state's right.

Ultimately, Virginia ceded its trans-Ohio River lands on its own terms and Maryland joined the other 12 states in ratifying the Articles. Still, the question of states' rights remained a live one. In form, the Confederation government was a league of sovereigns, and Article II announced that the states would remain sovereign. The Articles left virtually all power, including the power to tax and the power to raise armies, in the hands of the states, to whom congressmen remained beholden for their offices.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading