Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

CENSORSHIP IS THE practice of restraining or con-trolling communication on the basis of content. Because of the strong tradition of First Amendment rights to freedom of expression, censorship has negative connotations in the United States, but in many other parts of the world it is an accepted part of life. Censorship may be formal, in which it is part of official government policy and enforced by police and the courts, or informal, in which community organizations indicate their disapproval of objectionable content. There are four basic types of censorship: morals, military, political, and religious.

In the United States, the political right is most frequently associated with morals censorship, and in particular the suppression of sexual content in the arts. Conservatives have traditionally been very concerned about the possibility that such portrayals can erode the public morality, and as a result have rigorously supported legislation against obscenity and pornography. Conservatives have also objected to favorable portrayals of crime and disrespect for established authority on similar grounds of endangering good moral order.

Obscenity is defined as language or behavior that is lewd or indecent, whereas pornography involves written or pictorial content. However, in common parlance the terms are often used interchangeably. The first federal moral censorship law was passed in 1842 as part of the Tariff Act, and dealt with the importation of objectionable materials from abroad. However, the bestknown decency legislation in the United States is the Comstock Law, passed in 1873 by controversial reformer Anthony Comstock. This law prohibits the mailing of indecent material or information on abortion and birth control. While it was probably intended to be used by police and the courts, in fact it was used to support postal officials' seizure of materials they found objectionable. For 80 years this administrative censorship continued, but social change in the 1960s brought an end to the practice, although the law was never repealed.

Morals Censorship

The first blow against formal morals censorship by the American right was struck in 1957 with Roth v. the United States, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment guarantee of free speech restricted prosecution to only those materials that a court had found obscene. The next critical judgment against broad applications of morals censorship came in 1973 with Miller v. California, which established the “contemporary community standards” rule for determining what constituted indecency. The court also added that a work could only be considered indecent if it lacked any literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, protecting such materials as classical nudes and gynecological texts.

Although the sexual revolution slowed formal morals censorship in the United States, informal censorship by conservative organizations remained strong. The motion picture and television industries have policed themselves as a result of concern that groups such as the Catholic Decency League and later the Moral Majority might otherwise press for legal measures. Restrictive protocols such as the Hayes Office have largely given way to ratings systems such as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), which informs viewers of potentially objectionable content and permits parents to decide what they will allow their children to see while making adult material available to mature audiences.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading