Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Perceptual Development: Visual Acuity

Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of spatial resolution of the visual system, which is determined at least in part by the ability of the eye to focus incoming rays of light directly onto the retina at the back of the eye. For mature, cooperative, verbal individuals, VA is typically measured by having the subject identify letters on an eye chart that is at a precise distance from the individual. The stimuli are black letters on a white background, yielding the highest possible contrast. In a clinical setting, VA is generally defined as a fraction with the denominator specifying the distance at which the subject sees what most individuals see at 20 feet. Normal VA of 20/20 can be achieved for most individuals naturally or by use of optical correction to focus the rays of light onto the back of the retina. The standard and familiar Snellen chart has been in use since the mid-1800s. The singular “E” at the top of this chart makes a good reference point: If this is the only letter that an individual can identify, his or her VA is approximately 20/200, or at 20 feet this individual can see what most people see at 200 feet. Typically, an individual with 20/200 or worse VA is considered “legally blind.”

Still, the question remains: How do you know what an infant can see? True, these youngest of humans will not be reading an eye chart or even identifying visual shapes. But researchers have devised some relatively simple yet sophisticated ways to determine what infants see. Behavioral and electrophysiological measures are the two most commonly used techniques for evaluating visual acuity in human infants. These techniques are quite different from each other, but both have their place in research as well as clinical applications. This entry describes the behavioral and electrophysiological measures of VA and newborns, along with the underlying physiological limitations relating to VA and newborns.

Behavioral Measures

Researchers can learn about infant visual acuity by very carefully watching their looking behaviors under controlled conditions. When an infant is shown two visual stimuli presented side by side against a uniform background, he or she will typically look longer at one pattern than another. Researchers can use this looking behavior to infer that the infant can tell the difference between the two patterns. This strategy for evaluating infant visual perception was first pioneered in the early 1960s by Robert Fantz. His series of experiments were designed to determine if newborn human infants were able to perceive any visual patterns. Fantz used a paradigm known as preferential looking (PL). His strategy was to position an infant in front of a visual display that occluded the infant's view of anything but the screen in front of him. Two patterns were displayed on the screen, one to the right and one to the left of the center. An observer, positioned behind the screen with no view of what the infant was looking at, could watch the infant's eyes and record the amount of time that the infant looked at each pattern. The PL protocol was used to determine infants' preferences for a variety of patterns, such as black and white horizontal stripes versus a black-and-white bull's-eye. The original series of experiments focused on differentiating infants' preferences based on such dimensions as complexity, number, size, regularity, and curvature. One limitation of this paradigm is that group data are required to make any statements regarding visual perception. In other words, vision could not be quantified for an individual infant. Furthermore, the pairing of patterns and preference for one pattern over the other was not guided by a cohesive, reliable theory of visual information processing.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading