Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Neural Prosthetic Systems

The brain receives input from all the senses and can transmit signals to the spinal cord for the execution of body movements. However, injury or disease can deprive the brain of sensory input or can interrupt output pathways, resulting in motor paralysis. The field of neural prosthetics aims to restore motor or sensory function through output and input pathways other than the brain's normal channels.

Brain stem strokes and diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease), can lead to the most severe form of paralysis, as patients can lose all movement ability and become “locked in.” Cervical spinal cord injuries (at the neck) also disrupt communication channels between the brain and spinal cord and can lead to quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). All these patients have functioning brains and can still think about making movements and form the associated motor intentions, but they cannot execute these intentions. Motor prosthetic systems (MPSs) aim to harness these intentions and thoughts by recording their neural representation directly from the brain and relaying them to algorithms trained to control external devices, such as robotic arms or computer software. Ideally, in patients with spinal cord injuries, these devices may restore movements of the patients' own limbs by reconnecting the brain to the body below the injury, acting as a bridge that bypasses the severed section of the spinal cord.

An MPS is a framework that encompasses devices or programs to (a) record neural signals, (b) interpret the neural signals, and (c) control external devices. Thus, this field is highly interdisciplinary, requiring research across many branches of medicine and engineering, including neurosurgery, neuro science, computer science, robotics, materials science, and microfabrication. This entry focuses on signals recorded from inside the brain from areas related to movement planning and execution. Three areas in particular have been shown to contain useful signals for MPS: the motor cortex (M1), the parietal cortex, and the dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC). These regions form a network for visually guided reaching by transforming visual input about the location of the target into commands that move the limb toward the target. Studies have shown that this network is affected by the reward associated with a target and can participate in decision making. The viability of this network for prosthetic control is enhanced when one considers that these areas are also engaged by cognitive processes, such as movement imagination. This entry first describes the neural signals in these areas and discusses some of the studies that utilized these signals for prosthetic control. It also describes the clinical trials currently under way. Then, this entry considers some of the challenges that have to be overcome and incorporated into the future development of flexible and effective MPSs.

Motor Neural Prosthetics Systems Using Variables Decoded from the Motor Cortex

The motor cortex (M1) can actuate movement in any body part by transmitting signals to the appropriate spinal cord level. These descending pathways form the communication channels that convey volitional movement instructions to the body. For example, reaching toward an object activates populations of neurons in M1 that encode the trajectory of the hand in space. Normally, these signals are sent to the spinal cord and are executed resulting in hand movements along the encoded trajectory. Researchers have used this finding as proof that M1 contains viable signals to drive MPSs because populations of neurons that control the trajectory of the hand could, in theory, directly control the trajectory of a robotic arm or a computer mouse. Much progress has been made to read out movements or movement plans from the motor cortex of monkeys, and more recently humans. A multielec-trode array is typically implanted in the arm region of M1 in monkeys trained to perform reaches or move a cursor on a screen with a joystick. The activity of neurons is then recorded while the monkeys perform the tasks, and a mathematical model is built that relates the activity of the neurons to the cursor movement (or arm movement). Thus, every time the population of neurons fire, the model attempts to improve its ability to predict the movement direction of the cursor (or arm) by learning the relationship between neural activity and the resultant movement direction. After a satisfactory model is obtained, the model output is connected directly to the computer controlling the cursor. At this time, the joystick is disabled, forcing the monkeys to control the cursor using their neural activity and the model. The model, in effect, becomes a proxy for the arm and joystick. Immediately after the actual joystick is disabled, the monkeys generate muscular activity in their arm as they “will” the cursor to its target. This activity quickly subsides, however, as the monkeys learn to successfully move the cursor using only their thoughts. The signal pathway is thus transformed from the brain to the spinal cord to the arm to the joystick to the cursor, then to the brain to mathematical model to cursor. Thus, communication channels can be reopened by allowing paralyzed patients to control a joystick (or a computer mouse) using their thoughts. Clinical trials in humans have shown that this is indeed the case.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading