Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Color Constancy

We would rather eat a banana that looks yellow than one that looks green because the banana's color appearance carries reliable information about its ripeness. In general, color appearance is a useful percept because it provides reliable information about object identity and state. When we search for our car in a large parking lot, we rely on color to pick out likely candidates; our driver's licenses list the color of our eyes and hair for identification; we detect that a friend is embarrassed by the blush of his or her face.

For color appearance to provide useful information about objects, it must correlate with properties intrinsic to objects and be stable against transient features of the environment in which the objects are viewed, such as the illumination. This stability, which is provided in good measure by our visual systems, is called color constancy. That we have generally good constancy is consistent with everyday experience. We are content to refer to objects as having a well-defined color, and only rarely (e.g., when looking for our car in a parking lot illuminated by sodium vapor lamps) do we observe large failures of constancy. This entry describes the problem of color constancy, empirical observations, and theories of constancy.

The Problem of Color Constancy

Vision obtains information about objects through the light reflected from them. If the reflected light were in one-to-one correspondence with physical object properties, then extracting stable object percepts would be straightforward. But the reflected light confounds properties of the illumination with those of the object. In the case of color, the relevant object property is its surface reflectance function S(λ): the fraction of incident illuminant power that is returned to the eye at each wavelength λ. The relevant property of the illuminant is its spectral power distribution, I(λ): the amount of power at each wavelength that arrives at the object. The spectrum reflected to the eye is thus C(λ) = I(λ) S(λ). C(λ) is called the color signal. Ambiguity arises because of the symmetric role played by I(λ) and S(λ) in the formation of the color signal. For example, a banana seen in skylight might reflect the same spectrum to the eye as does grass under direct sunlight because the effect of the illuminant change on the color signal can be counteracted by the change in surface reflectance. The perceptual challenge of color constancy is to make object color appearance stable against changes in I(λ) while making it sensitive to changes in object reflectance S(λ).

Empirical Observations

To what extent does the visual system actually stabilize object color in the face of illuminant changes? This has been studied with scaling and naming paradigms where observers describe the color appearance of objects seen under different illuminants, as well as with matching paradigms where observers adjust a test object seen under one illuminant to match the appearance of reference object seen under a different illuminant. A few generalizations may be drawn from the large empirical literature. First, color appearance does vary somewhat when the illuminant is changed: color constancy is not perfect. Second, the variation in object appearance is small compared with what would be predicted for a visual system with no constancy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading